Likability Trap Ensnares Obama, Romney

Wednesday, 12 Sep 2012 11:27 AM

By Kathleen Parker

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
One of the great fallacies of politics — and life — is that one must be liked to be effective.

It helps, just as it helps to be attractive or athletic or kind. But let's be honest: It's almost impossible to like candidates once you get to know them.

Yet we dedicate an awful lot of time to measuring candidates' likability and forcing them to pretend to be someone that some political consultant thinks we'll admire.

How often during the current season have we heard that Mitt Romney just isn't likable? Sure, he's smart, successful, a good family man, a thoroughly decent guy, but we just don't like him all that much.

A few days ago, a Reuters/Ipsos poll was released with this headline: "Obama gets high marks on likability, weak on economy."

Well, that clears things up. The economy is tanking, but he's a nice guy — more likable than Romney by 50 percent to 30 percent, according to the poll. Forty-one percent said they believe Obama "understands people like me." Only 28 percent said the same about Romney.

The same poll also found that 75 percent believe the economy is on the wrong track, compared to 17 percent who think it's doing all right.

Who are these people?

This ridiculous matrix for assessing a candidate's qualifications for office is the inevitable offspring of the cultural coupling of narcissism and attention deficit disorder, otherwise defined as an inability to think for more than two minutes about anything more complicated than oneself.

Thus, "like me" may be the two most dangerous words in the American lexicon. "Like me, please" has become the operative prerogative of campaigns, essentially forcing politicians to pander so that we can dislike them even more.

Of all the pandering we despise — whether to minorities, single mothers, or Bikers for Biden — the most despicable is pandering to the poor. Ah, yes, we've all been there: Walking miles in the snow with tattered shoes, driving rusted-out cars and fishing furniture from dumpsters.

These last two notches on the totem pole of "been there, done that" were submitted by Michelle Obama during her convention speech by way of etching a sketch of her and Barack's pre-millionaire lives. Didn't we all drive crummy cars (if we had one)? And didn't we all cruise the neighborhood at night looking for discarded tables and couches?

Similarly, Ann Romney invoked her early married days when she and Mitt used an ironing board for a dining room table. In trying to neutralize the impression that the Romneys were born rich and a little too lucky, Ann took a tour of Wales, where her grandfather had been a coal miner.

All these reminiscences were aimed, of course, at being "likable," as though we need our leaders to have been poor or to have struggled in some pedestrian way. Anyone who has taken a breath has struggled, if not always financially. As Ann Romney told me in an interview not long ago, "We couldn't be doing this if we weren't successful."

Now there's an honest statement.

While we're at it, let's defer to Joan Didion's observation that it's not as though we've all been "gazing down 600 years of rolled lawns." She was referring to the fact that, with rare exceptions, most of us are only a generation or two away from the kind of struggles no one wishes to revisit.

My own maternal grandparents grew most of what they ate and sometimes it wasn't much. My paternal grandmother was raised in a convent because her parents couldn't afford to feed their 11th child.

These facts make me no more qualified for public office — or more likable — than the other fact that I adopted a discarded blind poodle. Then again . . .

More to the point: What if the current president were not born of a Kenyan student and a white girl from Kansas? What if his father had been a governor and head of an auto manufacturing company? Would he be less likable?

We are the sum of our genes and experiences, to be sure, and some of us are more likable than others for a variety of reasons. But being "like me" or "like you" qualifies us only as good dinner partners.

Which is not nothing, as long-married couples will attest.

Kathleen Parker's columns appear in more than 400 newspapers. She won the prestigious H.L. Mencken Writing Award in 1993. Read more reports from Kathleen Parker — Click Here Now.








© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Mark Sanford's Ongoing Saga With Himself

Wednesday, 17 Sep 2014 09:32 AM

As a South Carolinian, it befalls me to examine the peculiarities afflicting our former governor and now-Congressman Mar . . .

Solid Ground Game Beat Eric Cantor

Monday, 16 Jun 2014 13:33 PM

About that stunning defeat. Conventional Wisdom, that self-righteous propagandist, has it that Republican House Majority . . .

Gun Sales Need Sensible Scrutiny

Wednesday, 11 Jun 2014 09:30 AM

So much for the argument that having more people armed in public places will result in fewer gun deaths. One of the thre . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved