Cain’s Denials Harder to Believe Now That Accuser Is Known

Wednesday, 09 Nov 2011 03:48 PM

By Kathleen Parker

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
If you were Herman Cain, what would you do?

Undoubtedly countless men have pondered this question the past several days. The query got trickier when feminist attorney Gloria Allred presented a fourth woman — in person — to recount a past sexual transgression involving the former pizza executive.

Or, as Allred colorfully put it, Cain's idea of a "stimulus package."

Oh, chortle, chortle. Perhaps finding herself in the Friars' Club, where Allred called a news conference, she couldn't resist her inner comic.

If true, the experience related by Sharon Bialek, a former employee of the National Restaurant Association's educational foundation, was more than a joke. Allegedly, on the pretense of showing Bialek the restaurant association's offices, Cain parked the car and essentially assaulted Bialek, slipping his hand under her skirt and trying to bring her head toward his lap.

Not a very presidential image that.

When Bialek protested, reminding Cain that she had a boyfriend, he allegedly said, "You want a job, right?"

Corroborating testimony via written statements from two other individuals, whom Bialek had told about the incident at the time, including her then-boyfriend, further reduces Cain's wiggle room. Bialek didn't share details of the assault back then, saying now that she was too embarrassed.

Cain said Tuesday he doesn’t even know Bialek. He also has denied the allegations of two other women who filed complaints and received settlements from the restaurant association, as well as a third, who says she considered filing a complaint. Even as one types "three other women," deniability seems less plausible. In journalism, three is a trend. Four is a tipping point.

Whereas the other women remained anonymous (until one's name was revealed Tuesday), Bialek is quite real. She has a name. She has a record of employment. She has a son. Most important, she has Allred, whose entrance into any arena does not usually bode well for a man accused.

Women, too, may wonder what they would do? Would they file a complaint and settle for a year's salary if their boss made sexual advances or otherwise made them feel uncomfortable at work? Would they step forward 14 years later to face a nation's scrutiny, including the inevitable questions of their own credibility?

It's a nasty business.

The male in a sexual harassment equation has two choices: Confess and quit or deny and push on. In his denials, Cain has said repeatedly that he has never "sexually harassed" anyone, and to his mind, this may be true. In the first three cases, he may well think that his behavior was gregarious and friendly, within the bounds of acceptable.

He may even feel that whatever happened in the car with Bialek was not out of bounds depending on his perception of the circumstances.

Bialek said she contacted Cain to ask for help in finding a job, met him for drinks and dinner, and, having learned that he had upgraded her room to a suite (talk about smooth), went willingly with him in the car. Was she perhaps naive in thinking he had only an office tour in mind?

Be still my sisters. I'm not suggesting that Bialek was asking for anything more than a job. I'm merely trying to put myself in Cain's shoes and see things as he might have. And this is where he gets into trouble.

No amount of rationalizing, no amount of wine (Bialek recalled that he probably had a couple of glasses with dinner), nothing really justifies this behavior. If Bialek is telling the truth, then Herman Cain is a predator, not to mention a boor, and no man for the presidency.

Still we are left with he said/she said and Cain knows that we can't know what happened. He knows that in sexual harassment cases, the sin is in the eye of the beholder. One man's flirtation is another man's unwelcome advance. One woman's embarrassment of riches is another's hostile workplace.

Politically — and considering the peace in his own home — Cain has nothing to lose by sticking to his guns. He figures his base hates the media more than they hate whatever he did. And there's ample precedent for this approach. Absent a blue dress, why should he confess?

Cain could survive, though whether he should is another question. The claims of four women require a lot of denial, and people are not credulous. They have a sense of things. They know what "is" is. The beholder's eye is now public opinion and the image has been irretrievably set — of a man and a woman in a parked car.

Kathleen Parker's email address is kathleenparker@washpost.com.




© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Solid Ground Game Beat Eric Cantor

Monday, 16 Jun 2014 13:33 PM

About that stunning defeat. Conventional Wisdom, that self-righteous propagandist, has it that Republican House Majority . . .

Gun Sales Need Sensible Scrutiny

Wednesday, 11 Jun 2014 09:30 AM

So much for the argument that having more people armed in public places will result in fewer gun deaths. One of the thre . . .

In Memory of Two Friends

Monday, 09 Jun 2014 07:13 AM

I had been friends with John Vasconcellos, the California legislator who was a weaver of big dreams and a lampoon target . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved