Because of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership between the European Union and Islamic states in the Middle East, by the year 2050 the Islamic population of Europe will be 25 percent to 30 percent of the total population.
There will be perhaps over 100 million Muslims in Europe.
The effects on European civilization, and on Europe’s relationship with the United States, are all too easy to imagine. And the U.S.-Muslim Engagement document
, the blueprint for the Obama administration’s relationship with Muslim countries, parallels these plans.
It contains the same “cross-culturalization” plans that are discussed and recommended in the Euro-Med Partnership. In other words, it’s a charter for our subservience to Islamic law.
It’s all parsed out in a series of “Association Agreements,” which delineate the concrete terms of the new relationships between the EU and the Islamic countries involved in the Euro-Med Partnership.
One Euro-Med Web page
explains that there are “certain common aspects” to all these agreements, including “political dialogue, respect for human rights and democracy, establishment of WTO-compatible free trade over a transitional period of up to 12 years, provisions relating to intellectual property, services, public procurement, competition rules, state aids and monopolies, economic cooperation,” and most significantly, “cooperation relating to social affairs and migration and cultural cooperation.”
Take a look, for example, at the Association Agreement with Egypt
. The links in the online version, significantly, have all been suspended, and are routed into a new site for the European Union that offers no information.
They are hiding everything having to do with this. But surprisingly, one Euro-Med page
is still up, and explains that the agreement with Egypt will involve the “training of persons working in the cultural field” and the promotion of “cultural cooperation of a commercial nature, production, investment and marketing, training and exchange of information.”
“Cultural cooperation”: that’s where the rubber meets the road on immigration and related issues.
It means Europe will conform to Islamic norms and not attempt to challenge them. And one main arena of this cultural cooperation was formally launched on June 9, 2008, in Slovenia: a new Euro-Med University. Based in Piran on the Adriatic coast, the University invites established European universities to become partner institutions — in Britain, the Universities of Westminister, Cambridge and Bristol have shown interest in such a partnership.
This cross-culturization among universities and colleges will lead to education and history being filtered through an Islamic prism, leading to institutional fascism and historical revisionism.
If you go to the EMUNI (Euro-Med University) site
, it gives you a clear indication of what they are up to.
Front and center is the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC)’s Alliance of Civilizations. The great historian Bat Ye’or said the following of the Alliance of Civilizations in a speech given at the Counter Jihad conference in Brussels in 2007: “The Alliance of Civilizations, created to oppose the clash of civilizations, that is jihad, has also added pressure. On 13 November 2006, the High-Level Group of the Alliance of Civilizations presented its report, which sums up the request of the OIC at its Mecca Summit in 2005, after the Cartoons affair.
“First, it adopts the Islamic view of history and politics by claiming that everything was fine between the three monotheistic religions until the 19thcentury, when the evil of European colonialism and Zionism destroyed this harmony.”
Bat Ye’or adds that the Alliance “affirms that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the main source of Christian-Muslim antagonism, not the jihadist war and ideology that deny for others the right to exist. It proclaims that this conflict ‘remains one of the gravest threats to international stability’ and formulates recommendations that again echo the OIC requests.
Such views mirror Hitler accusing the Jews of fomenting World War II, or the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, praised in the Hamas charter, the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood which denies Israel’s right to exist.”
Why would Europe get involved again with such evil, and simultaneously take in such a diabolical and disastrous immigration bomb? And that’s what this is.
Geert Wilders said it in a speech at Columbia University in October 2009: “Make no mistake: Islam has always attempted to conquer Europe. Spain fell in the 8th century. Constantinople fell in the 15th century. Vienna and Poland were threatened, and now, in the 21st century, Islam is trying again. This time not with military armies, but through migration and demography.”
Why cause that social strain?
Pamela Geller is the editor and publisher of the Atlas Shrugs Web site and is former associate publisher of the New York Observer. Her Op-Eds have appeared in The Washington Times, Newsmax, Human Events, Big Government, WorldNetDaily, the American Thinker, and others. She is co-author of “The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America” (Simon and Schuster).
© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.