Chaffetz: White House Told Libya that Benghazi Was Terrorism the Day After Attacks

Sunday, 04 May 2014 02:08 PM

By Greg Richter

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
    A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
The State Department told the Libyan government that the fatal attacks on the U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi were carried out by a terrorist group the day after the attacks, even though the White House continued for some time afterward blaming it on a spontaneous riot over an anti-Muslim video, says Rep. Jason Chaffetz.

Chaffetz, appearing Sunday on "Meet the Press," said he is in possession of an internal State Department document from Cheryl Mills, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's chief of staff, that blames the attacks on Ansar al-Sharia, a terrorist group.

"So why is that we told the Libyans the truth and told the American people a lie?" asked the Republican Utah Congressman, a member of the House Oversight Committee.

The document is dated Sept. 12, 2012, Chaffetz said, one day after the attacks that left four Americans dead, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens.

Republicans have been focusing during the past week on a newly released email showing that it was the White House that was behind talking points suggesting blame for the attacks came from the video. Members of the intelligence community did not point to the video in the Benghazi attacks, though it was blamed for protests around the same time in other places, including Cairo.

But nobody, in real time, thought that the Benghazi attack was caused by a protest over a video, Chaffetz said.

"I think that was a false narrative from the beginning," he said. "It was perpetuated over the course of time. In my mind, that became a lie. It was never true in Libya."

Critics have said the White House was looking for something besides terrorism to blame the attacks on because President Barack Obama was in a tight race for re-election and was making the case on the campaign trail that al-Qaida was "on the run" after the killing of its leader, Osama bin Laden.

It is also seen as a potential millstone for Clinton, who is the presumed Democratic frontrunner for president in 2016.

"As journalists, you do not have the answer as to why was the ambassador there?" Chaffetz told host David Gregory. "What happened, for instance, on April 6, 2012 when our facility was bombed? It was bombed again on June 6 of 2012. The British ambassador had an assassination attempt. What did Secretary Clinton do to secure that facility?"

Related Stories:

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Rep. Erik Paulsen: Obamacare About to Hit Every American

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 18:41 PM

Minnesota Rep. Erik Paulsen says that every American is about to feel the effects of Obamacare when tax season hits in 2 . . .

FALN Victim's Son: Return 2 Cop Killers Living in Cuba to US

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 17:45 PM

Two cop killers brazenly living in Cuba must be returned to the United States now that new diplomatic relations have bee . . .

Gordon Chang: NKorea Didn't Act Alone in Cyberattack

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 16:58 PM

North Korea did not act alone in its devastating cyberattack on Sony Pictures, as President Barack Obama asserted on Fri . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved