Law Prof: Hobby Lobby Case a 'Maybe' for Future of Religious Liberty

Tuesday, 01 Jul 2014 08:34 PM

By Sean Piccoli

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
The Supreme Court's decision exempting a family-owned business from Obamacare's birth-control coverage mandate is both small-scale and potentially bigger in its future impact than anybody realizes, Harvard Law professor Mark Tushnet told Newsmax TV on Tuesday.

A lot depends on what other people with religious convictions— and lawyers — decide the high court's ruling means, Tushnet, a former law clerk for Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall, told "MidPoint" host Ed Berliner.

Story continues below video.


Note: Watch Newsmax TV now on DIRECTV Ch. 349 and DISH Ch. 223
Get Newsmax TV on your cable system – Click Here Now

Tushnet said Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc. "looks like a rather limited opinion that won't substantially interfere with the overall operation of the Affordable Care Act or even probably limit the access of employees . . . to the kinds of contraceptives that Hobby Lobby objects to."

Tushnet said Justice Samuel Alito, writing for a 5-4 majority, took pains to keep the opinion narrow.

"It says we're dealing only with contraception, not with blood transfusions or vaccinations," said Tushnet. "It says we're dealing only with a closely held family corporation, not with a publicly held corporation.

"And all of that is right. But it's also true that the legal analysis that he offers is something that people with religious objections to vaccinations might be able to use effectively, and that large, not-family-owned corporations might be able to use effectively," he said. "We just don't know from the opinion."

He said another two to three years' worth of related lawsuits and rulings will come and go "before we actually know what the contours of the decision and its effects are."

More clear, said Tushnet, is the relatively small hit Obamacare took from the justices carving out a religous-conscience exception to the rule that all employer-provided medical insurance plans include coverage for contraceptives.

"It's not a major blow," said Tushnet. "It'll be relatively easy for the administration, through regulations, to work around [the ruling]. There are more important or serious challenges pending to the overall Affordable Care Act . . . in the lower courts."

He said the Department of Health and Human Services is probably already busy writing a new, Hobby Lobby-friendly version of the contraception mandate.

"Then there will be more litigation about that," he said.


Related Stories:

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Rep. Tom Cole: Take Time on ISIS Strategy

Sunday, 31 Aug 2014 18:23 PM

There is "too much emphasis on acting now" when it comes to dealing with the threat posed by the Islamic State (ISIS), O . . .

Rep. Kinzinger: 'Are We Going to Contain ISIS or Crush ISIS?'

Sunday, 31 Aug 2014 12:42 PM

Illinois Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger says there is one main question when it comes to how to handle the violent Islam . . .

Sen. Menendez: US, NATO Should Arm Ukraine

Sunday, 31 Aug 2014 11:06 AM

The United States "should provide the Ukrainians with the type of defensive weapons that will impose a cost" upon Russia . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved