Gun Plaintiff: DC Mayor's Gun Legislation Is De Facto Ban

Tuesday, 05 Aug 2014 02:23 PM

By Courtney Coren

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Washington, D.C., Mayor Vincent Gray is working on legislation to comply with a ruling that lifted a gun ban in the nation's capital, and Dr. Tom Palmer, the plaintiff in that case, says he fears that the proposal will amount to a de facto ban.

"The D.C. government’s position and the mayor’s position . . . has been that the power, the authority to establish reasonable time, place and manner regulations extends to banning it," Palmer said on "America's Forum" on Newsmax TV on Tuesday.

Story continues below video.

Note: Watch Newsmax TV now on DIRECTV Ch. 349 and DISH Ch. 223
Get Newsmax TV on your cable system – Click Here Now

U.S. District Court Judge Frederick Scullin granted the District of Columbia a 90-day stay on July 29 on his ruling that lifted the ban on handguns in the nation's capital, which prevented citizens from carrying guns outside their homes. The stay was granted in response to a motion filed by the city.

As the city determines how to implement the court's ruling, the mayor is working on draft legislation to comply with Scullin's decision.

"If they read the Constitution as they have interpreted the Second Amendment, it means that they could legitimately under the First Amendment shut down every church, every mosque, every synagogue and every temple of the District of Columbia," Palmer said.

"That cannot be true. It’s a completely childish and crazy position and the court has educated them in the meaning of the law," he said.

"They should sit down with their lawyers and realize that they got licked, they were wrong and just begin to recognize our constitutional rights in D.C.," he added.

"It’s as if the First Amendment were to be upheld for the right to freedom of speech or the free exercise of religion and he would say, 'We’re puzzled by the implications of that,'" Palmer said.

"There are reasonable time, place and manner regulations governing the exercise of even fundamental rights," he said.

"You have the right to freedom of expression, but maybe not in my neighborhood at 2:30 in the morning with a bullhorn in front of my house waking up everybody in the neighborhood, but that does not mean that extends to a complete ban," he added.

Related Stories:
Gun Advocate: 'Docs vs. Glocks' Law, Not About Protecting Children
Family of 5 Shot Dead in Maine, Gun Recovered

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Alveda King: Police Should Re-Examine How They Defend Selves

Tuesday, 21 Oct 2014 17:51 PM

As a grand jury weighs charges against a white police officer who fatally shot a young black man in Ferguson, Missouri,  . . .

Author: Migrant Kids Will Get Refugee Status After Election

Tuesday, 21 Oct 2014 17:05 PM

Even though the number of Central American minors coming across the U.S. border has slowed, author and foreign correspon . . .

Telling It Like It Is: Who's Behind the Ebola Campaign Ad?

Tuesday, 21 Oct 2014 16:36 PM

"MidPoint" host Ed Berliner names the producers behind the campaign ad blaming Republicans for pulling funding from the  . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved