Catholic Group: 'Absurd' to Call Contraceptive Ruling War on Women

Tuesday, 01 Jul 2014 12:40 PM

By Melissa Clyne

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
The Supreme Court's ruling on Hobby Lobby signifies one of the biggest religious liberty rulings in a very long time,  Ashley McGuire, senior fellow at the Catholic Association, tells Newsmax TV.

"Basically what the court said is that you don't have to forfeit your religion to start a family business," McGuire said on "America's Forum."

"That should be obvious to all of us, but in today's age, it's apparently not, and it's definitely not apparent to our president."

Story continues below video.


Note: Watch Newsmax TV now on DIRECTV Ch. 349 and DISH Ch. 223
Get Newsmax TV on your cable system – Click Here Now

On Monday, the high court released its 5-4 decision finding that limited for-profit businesses can cite a religious exemption from an Obamacare mandate to provide healthcare coverage for four contraceptives the evangelical Christian owners say amount to abortion, including the morning-after pill and intrauterine devices.

McGuire said that for Democrats, including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, to paint the issue as a war on women is "absurd" and something she "flat-out rejects."

"The plaintiffs, Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood, are co-owned by women," she said. "Then you look at the nonprofit cases, which are yet to be decided, and the first case to hit the court is a group of women, Little Sisters of the Poor and EWTN, a Catholic news network started by a woman.

"So, the idea that this is about men versus women is absurd, and then this really paternalistic line the left has about bosses versus women's rights, implies that women aren't bosses."

She further offered that the only forms of birth control addressed in the Hobby Lobby case were ones that the FDA has labeled as destroying an embryo, which the Hobby Lobby owners and other Christians consider abortion.

"Groups like Planned Parenthood are saying, oh, these aren't abortifacient [causing abortion]. Well, if they aren't, then why are you there?"

Related Stories:



© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Ben Stein: Shooter in Canada Should Have Been Under Tight Surveillance

Thursday, 23 Oct 2014 16:41 PM

Actor and economist Ben Stein says the suspect in the deadly shooting at the Canadian Parliament on Wednesday should hav . . .

Dick Morris: A Third Mitt Romney Run Would Be Bad for GOP

Thursday, 23 Oct 2014 16:34 PM

The 2016 Republican presidential nomination is Jeb Bush's if he wants it, and should not under any circumstances go to t . . .

Radio Host: Leaks from Ferguson Grand Jury 'Disturbing'

Thursday, 23 Oct 2014 16:14 PM

Jamie Allman, host of "Allman in the Morning" on FM News Talk 97.1 in St. Louis, joined Ed Berliner on "MidPoint" on New . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved