WSJ Rips New Obamacare Exemption for Congress

Thursday, 08 Aug 2013 01:31 PM

By Dan Weil

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
The administration's new rules that allow members of Congress and their staffs to escape the healthcare exchanges under Obamacare represent a double standard, according to a Wall Street Journal editorial.

It boils down to "illegal dispensations for the ruling class, different rules for the hoi polloi," the Journal said Thursday.

ObamaCare: You Can Win With The Facts

Obamacare stipulates that "the only health plans that the federal government may make available" to Congress are the ones that are part of the law's insurance exchanges.

But that requirement set off complaints among members and their aides, "because they won't qualify for Obamacare subsidies and they'll lose employer contributions they now receive under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP)," the Journal said.

The Journal criticized President Barack Obama for personally instructing the Office of Personnel Management to retain the congressional benefits.

"The eat-your-own-cooking provision begins with the phrase 'Notwithstanding any other provision of law.' The feds now interpret that clause as a loophole to mean that the Affordable Care Act did not change the 1959 law that created the FEHBP."

That means congressional employees can remain enrolled in the FEHBP at the same time that they use Obamacare exchanges.

"The feds then 'clarify' — their euphemism — that the regulatory meaning of health benefits in the FEHBP can be Obamacare plans. Voila, taxpayers will continue to chip in $4,900 for individual and $10,000 for family coverage," the editorial continued.

The lawmakers and their aides will still have to use the exchanges, as required by law, but only because it would have been "too explosive politically" not to, the Journal said.

The Journal said Congress would have done better to create a law offering its workers a raise to make up for the loss of government benefits and subsidies.

Editor's Note: Should ObamaCare Be Repealed? Vote in Urgent National Poll

"But that would mean an ugly political fight that voters might notice. It's so much easier to slip through this political fix in August when Congress is out of session and the press corps can't wait to hit the beach," the newspaper said.




© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Obama Faces Growing Rebellion Against Deportation Program

Thursday, 24 Apr 2014 11:54 AM

On April 16, Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter announced that the city would no longer agree to federal government reque . . .

Chris Ruddy: Jeb Bush Will Rise With Immigration Stance

Thursday, 24 Apr 2014 11:42 AM

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush set off a firestorm when he said people who come to America illegally to provide a better l . . .

WSJ: Obamacare Agencies Seek to Fix Prices, Limit Costs

Thursday, 24 Apr 2014 11:28 AM

Obamacare's Independent Payment Advisory Board and Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation are bureaucracies that hi . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved