Tags: us | health | care | overhaul

Senate Dems at Odds Over Healthcare Insurance

Tuesday, 08 Dec 2009 03:51 PM

 

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink

WASHINGTON -- Senate Democrats remained at odds Tuesday over President Barack Obama's healthcare overhaul, with moderates cheering a move away from a new government insurance plan and liberals demanding in exchange an expansion of the federal Medicare and Medicaid programs.

Time is of the essence as Democrats strive to pass Obama's healthcare remake in the Senate by Christmas.

On the floor, senators debated an amendment to place tight restrictions on abortion funding, but the real action was in negotiations between Democratic moderates and liberals over the creation of a government insurance plan to compete with private carriers. Such a so-called public option is now in the bill, but supporters acknowledged Tuesday that it may not have the votes to pass.

Special: Get Sarah Palin’s New Book – Incredible FREE Offer – Click Here Now.

"My worry is the public option is disappearing, or it gets very much weakened," said Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va, representing liberals in the negotiations.

In exchange for giving up on a new government plan, liberals are demanding major expansions of Medicare and Medicaid. Medicare would be opened up _ at least for a few years _ to uninsured people age 55 to 64. Medicaid would cover people earning up to one-and-a-half times the federal poverty level, or about $33,000 for a family of four.

"I don't give up on the public option unless there's major, major things in its place," said Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, also taking part in the talks.

Moderates welcomed the idea of replacing a new government plan with private insurance offered under the supervision of the Office of Personnel Management, which oversees the federal employee health benefits system, but they raised questions about expanding Medicare, and flat-out objected to extending Medicaid coverage.

Maine Sen. Olympia Snowe, one Republican who may vote for the Democrats' bill, also raised a warning flag. "I'm not sure ultimately what is the purpose" in broadening Medicare coverage, she said.

The Democratic negotiators, five liberals and five moderates, are under pressure to reach at least a tentative deal by Tuesday. The bill now includes a government-run plan that states can opt out of, unacceptable to moderates whose votes Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., needs to overcome Republican delaying tactics and move the bill to final passage.

Rockefeller said he personally doesn't think the public plan is dead, but it's evident the negotiations are taking place because Reid lacks the 60 votes he needs.

The latest public plan idea bears little resemblance to the original proposed by liberals, and embraced by Obama, during the 2008 presidential campaign. That called for the government to sell insurance to workers and their families in competition with industry giants like UnitedHealthcare.

But instead of Medicare-for-the-masses, it would be Blue Cross Blue Shield or Kaiser Permanente, albeit with a government seal of approval from the department that handles the health plan for federal employees, including members of Congress. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) would become an instantly recognizable federal acronym, like FDA and CDC.

The emerging compromise calls for the government to lend OPM's seal of approval to private plans that would be offered across the nation. The plans would be available through new state insurance markets, called exchanges. The exchanges would function like an insurance supermarket for those who now have trouble finding and keeping affordable coverage, primarily for people buying on their own and small businesses. Most of the 30 million consumers in the exchanges would have government subsidies to help pay premiums.

"It's probably the closest proposal thus far that could get the support of 60 senators. It's got legs," said Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., chairman of the Finance Committee.

Liberals say they won't settle for the compromise unless Medicare and Medicaid are expanded.

Under discussion is a Medicare "buy-in" for people 55 to 64 that would be available until government subsidies start flowing in 2014 to new health insurance markets for people who have trouble getting and keeping affordable coverage. Liberals also want a Medicare option permanently available after that date.

Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky ridiculed the Democrats' late-innings changes, and suggested adding more people to Medicare could undermine the program's already shaky finances. He called for Democrats to scrap the bill and start over.

"Americans would rather get it right than scurry around throwing together last-minute untested experiments to get 60 votes before Christmas," McConnell said.

Medicare now covers seniors 65 and older, as well as disabled people of any age. People in their mid-50s are among the most vulnerable to losing coverage, particularly in an economy where employers are still cutting jobs. But buying into Medicare would not be cheap. A current buy-in available to those 65 and older who don't qualify because of work history costs about $550 a month.

© Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Hillary Clinton's Book Title Revealed: 'Hard Choices'

Friday, 18 Apr 2014 07:53 AM

Potential presidential contender Hillary Clinton's memoir of her four years as secretary of state will be called "Hard C . . .

Gallup Poll: Record Disapproval Ratings for Obama on Economy

Thursday, 17 Apr 2014 22:41 PM

More than half of Americans said they had virtually no confidence in President Barack Obama's ability to improve the nat . . .

McFarlane: US Must Respond to Russian Aggression With 'Strength'

Friday, 18 Apr 2014 07:13 AM

Former National Security Adviser Robert McFarlane called on U.S. officials to counter Russian aggression in Ukraine with . . .

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved