Tags: us | financial | overhaul

Moderate Democrats Delay Bank Regulation Debate

Wednesday, 09 Dec 2009 04:53 PM


  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink

WASHINGTON -- A moderate Democrat revolt Wednesday was delaying the start of debate on a vast overhaul of regulations governing Wall Street, as centrists sought to amend some of the bill's tougher provisions.

The internal Democratic dispute centered on whether Democratic leaders would permit moderates to offer amendments on the House floor that would alter certain regulatory provisions, particularly ones governing consumer protections and complex derivatives trades.

Without assurances that their changes would get a vote, moderates were threatening to withhold their support for letting the bill proceed, congressional officials said.

Special: Get Sarah Palin’s New Book – Incredible FREE Offer -- Click Here Now.

Complicating the negotiations were changes that had already been granted to liberals and the likelihood they would get votes on some other of their preferences.

Democratic leaders feared that if some of the moderate amendments passed with Republican backing, the overall bill would lose appeal within the broader Democratic majority, thus imperiling its passage.

The Senate is not expected to act on its version of regulations until next year. Democrats wanted to make sure that amendments in the House did not weaken their hand when they have to reconcile bills with the Senate.

As proposed, the House bill hits big banks hardest, a response to public anger at the notion that some institutions had grown too big to fail and pushed the nation's financial system to the brink of collapse.

If the bill casts the largest banks as villains, it casts consumers as victims and provides for a new federal agency with regulatory and enforcement powers to oversee the public's dealings with lenders.

Moderates were seeking a chance to vote on amendments that would either eliminate a proposed Consumer Finance Protection Agency, a provision pushed by President Barack Obama, or eliminate the ability for states to enforce tougher state consumer laws.

Others wanted greater exemptions for firms trading in derivatives, the largely unregulated financial instruments blamed for accelerating last year's crisis.

© Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Retype Email:
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Harry Reid's Alma Mater Strips His Name from Building

Friday, 29 Aug 2014 16:31 PM

Southern Utah University, where Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid went to school, is stripping his name from one of its  . . .

Judicial Watch: 'Imminent' Terror Attack Warning on US Border

Friday, 29 Aug 2014 15:16 PM

Islamic State and al-Qaida terrorist cells are operating in a Mexican border town and are plotting to attack the United  . . .

Ron Paul: US Involvement in Iraq Made Things Worse

Friday, 29 Aug 2014 14:56 PM

The United States made things worse in the Middle East when it decided to go to war with the Iraq in 2003, especially in . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved