Tags: tanning | tax | irs

US Tanning Tax Not Exactly Glowing

Thursday, 13 Oct 2011 03:48 PM

 

Share:
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
   Forward Article  |
  Copy Shortlink

A new U.S. tax on indoor tanning is producing far less revenue than expected, with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service having trouble implementing the measure, the tax-collecting agency's auditor said Thursday.

An indoor tanning services excise tax was enacted in March 2010 as part of President Barack Obama's healthcare law. The tax took effect on July 1, 2010. It is supposed to be paid by customers and passed on by service providers to the IRS.

In the three months ended Sept. 30, the IRS received $17.8 million in tanning taxes, well below the $50 million congressional tax experts expected for the quarter.

The tax was projected to bring in $200 million in fiscal 2011, which started Oct. 1, but through the first half of that fiscal year, the tax collected only $36.6 million.

The IRS quickly implemented the tax and alerted businesses about it, but the agency could have done more to tell taxpayers to file the proper forms and pay the tax, according to a report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.

"Since this was a brand new tax imposed on a group of businesses and taxpayers with no previous experience with excise taxes, the IRS should have done more to inform taxpayers of their filing responsibilities and bring them into compliance," said Russell George, the top official at TIGTA.

The tanning industry's lobbying arm in Washington was not surprised. Estimates for tanning tax collection were "grossly overestimated" in part because the IRS "had no clue" about the size and scope of the industry, said John Overstreet, executive director of the Indoor Tanning Association.

After the healthcare law was passed, the IRS was left with the complex task of implementing the tax on an estimated 30,000 businesses that offer tanning -- ranging from tanning-exclusive shops to those with tanning as part of a hair salon or gym.

Other excise taxes, collected by telecommunication companies or airlines, are easier to implement because "it's very centralized" among fewer businesses, Overstreet said.

To alleviate the implementation challenge, IRS exempted "qualified physical fitness facilities" because it was deemed too hard to collect taxes on health clubs that include tanning as part of a package of services.

This has given health clubs a competitive edge over businesses that have to pay the tax, Overstreet said.

At an IRS hearing Tuesday, industry participants slammed the tax. Two bills introduced in the U.S. Congress in June would repeal the tax. (Reporting by Patrick Temple-West +1 202 354 5841; editing by Kevin Drawbaugh and Andre Grenon)

© 2014 Thomson/Reuters. All rights reserved.

Share:
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
   Forward Article  |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Peter King, Press Corps Irked Over White House Boston Observance

Tuesday, 15 Apr 2014 22:16 PM

The White House press corps was unhappy that it was not allowed access to a moment of silence for Boston Marathon victim . . .

Dick Morris: US Must Keep Electoral College

Tuesday, 15 Apr 2014 14:46 PM

Democrats are plotting to rig the presidential voting system to ensure that liberals win future elections, veteran polit . . .

Rancher: If Feds Plan Raid or Lawsuits, 'We'll Take You On'

Tuesday, 15 Apr 2014 23:04 PM

Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy says he doesn't know much about possible plans by the federal government to either raid his  . . .

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved