Tags: sequester | gop | spending | cuts

Huelskamp: Sequester Marks 'First Significant Tea Party Victory'

Tuesday, 26 Feb 2013 01:14 PM

By Sandy Fitzgerald

Share:
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
   Forward Article  |
  Copy Shortlink
Some GOP lawmakers see the budget sequester set to take place on Friday as a disaster, but tea party Republicans are ready to declare victory because it will finally produce the kind of deep spending cuts they say Congress and the president have been unable to accomplish.

“This will be the first significant tea party victory in that we got what we set out to do in changing Washington,” Kansas Rep. Tim Huelskamp, a conservative tea party Republican first elected in 2010, told the Washington Post.

Wisconsin Republican Rep. Reid J. Ribble, a conservative who was also elected in 2010, is not a member of the tea party. But he agrees with Huelskamp that the movement does deserve the right to celebrate over the pending cuts because it was "significant in getting the American people’s attention on this problem.

"You have to give them credit," Ribble told the Post.

But Huelskamp worries that anything could happen before Friday to upset the sequester, which would reduce federal spending across the board by an initial $85 billion as part of an overall target of $1.2 trillion in cuts over the next 10 years. He's concerned that his own leadership could agree to an alternative plan that would lessen the impact of the cuts or possibly delay them again.

According to the Post, Boehner and other GOP leaders are in a difficult spot. The most conservative members of their party, like Huelskamp, are urging them to stay the course on the sequester and allow the automatic cuts to proceed. But at the same time, the leaders are opposed to any more cuts in defense spending and, as the Post put it, "see little wisdom in indiscriminate, across-the-board reductions elsewhere."

“They promised the sequester would happen,” said Huelskamp, who voted against the original bill authorizing the sequester because he didn't believe it cut deep enough.

He also voted against Boehner for speaker earlier this year because of his efforts to negotiate a budget deal with the White House.

“For them to go back on their word certainly threatens their ability to lead," he said.




© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
   Forward Article  |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Peter King, Press Corps Irked Over White House Boston Observance

Tuesday, 15 Apr 2014 22:16 PM

The White House press corps was unhappy that it was not allowed access to a moment of silence for Boston Marathon victim . . .

Dick Morris: US Must Keep Electoral College

Tuesday, 15 Apr 2014 14:46 PM

Democrats are plotting to rig the presidential voting system to ensure that liberals win future elections, veteran polit . . .

Rancher: If Feds Plan Raid or Lawsuits, 'We'll Take You On'

Tuesday, 15 Apr 2014 23:04 PM

Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy says he doesn't know much about possible plans by the federal government to either raid his  . . .

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved