Login or Register
Welcome , Settings |  Logout

Former DOD Inspector Gen: Panetta’s Directive May be Unconstitutional

Friday, 25 Jan 2013 03:07 AM

By Paul Scicchitano

Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Reacting to reports that outgoing Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta is lifting the Pentagon’s long-standing ban on women serving in combat, former DOD Inspector General Joseph E. Schmitz tells Newsmax that he believes the decision will lead to a “degradation of good order and discipline” and may even be unconstitutional.

Senior defense officials say Panetta is removing the military's ban on women serving in combat, opening hundreds of thousands of front-line positions and potentially elite commando jobs after more than a decade at war.

“Introducing mixed gender combat units in my experience and judgment will inevitably lead to a degradation of good order and discipline,” asserted Schmitz, a recognized constitutional expert who held the position of DOD’s top investigator from April 2002 to September 2005 after 27 years of Naval Service, including four years at the Naval Academy, five years of active duty in the fleet, and 18 years in the Naval Reserve.

Note: Obama's Gun Grab — Do You Agree? Vote Here Now

Schmitz tells Newsmax that it is questionable whether Panetta has the authority to make such a change to America’s “land and naval forces,” since this authority is specifically granted in the Constitution to Congress.

“My first question as a commander frankly would be is this a legal order? And to answer that question I would have to find out by what authority, and for what purpose, did the secretary of defense do what he did here,” said Schmitz, who is also a Newsmax contributor.

The groundbreaking move recommended by the Joint Chiefs of Staff overturns a 1994 rule prohibiting women from being assigned to smaller ground combat units. Panetta's decision gives the military services until January 2016 to seek special exceptions if they believe any positions must remain closed to women.

“Last time I checked the secretary of defense serves under Article 2 of the Constitution,” Schmitz added, reading from the Constitution. “He’s not a member of Congress and he does not independently have the constitutional authority to ‘make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces.’”

Note: Obama's Gun Grab — Do You Agree? Vote Here Now

The issue of women serving in combat has been discussed for many years, according to Schmitz, but he said he has reservations as to whether the time is right for the ban to be lifted.

“I think generally speaking if you put human beings in stressful situations including combat and then you introduce a gender issue, it will inevitably lead to a degradation of good order and discipline,” Schmitz explained.

© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
More . . .
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by n class="logo-disqus"> Disqus
 
Hot Topics
Top Stories
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Sinclair Now Third Largest TV Group, Ahead of NBC, ABC

Saturday, 25 May 2013 12:19 PM

Sinclair Broadcast Group has climbed over three other major television networks and now is in third place in TVNewsCheck . . .

Hagel: Cadets Must Stamp out Sex Assault Scourge

Saturday, 25 May 2013 12:08 PM

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel told cadets at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point that they must stamp out the scourg . . .

Jindal: Obama Scandals Product of Big Government, 'Bound to Happen'

Saturday, 25 May 2013 09:54 AM

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal says the scandals facing President Obama are all interrelated and can be traced back to two  . . .

 
 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved