Pentagon Outlines Options for Military Intervention in Syria

Tuesday, 23 Jul 2013 12:22 PM

By Melanie Batley

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
    A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
The Pentagon has provided lawmakers with a detailed list of military options to support the rebels in the Syrian civil war but has said any campaign to tilt the balance away from President Bashar al-Assad would be a vast undertaking and cost the U.S. billions of dollars.

According to The New York Times, Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, outlined five options in a letter to Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, but warned, "Once we take action, we should be prepared for what comes next. Deeper involvement is hard to avoid."

Dempsey said a decision to use force "is no less than an act of war," adding, "We could inadvertently empower extremists or unleash the very chemical weapons we seek to control."

The proposal comes as the White House has begun to acknowledge that without more intervention from the U.S., Assad may be in power for at least another year.

The first option outlined in the letter focuses on training, advising and assisting the rebels.

The Pentagon estimates it would require anywhere from several hundred to several thousand U.S. troops at a cost of about $500 million a year.

A second option would be to conduct an offensive of limited, long-range strikes on high-value government military targets. That approach would require hundreds of aircraft and warships to the tune of billions of dollars over time.

A third option, Dempsey said, is a no-fly zone at the cost of $1 billion dollars per month to shoot down government warplanes and destroy airfields and hangars.

The establishment of a buffer zone is another option. It would be used to protect parts of Turkey or Jordan, provide a safe haven for Syrian rebels to train and organize, and a base for delivering humanitarian assistance. That option would likely require thousands of U.S. ground forces.

A final option would be a mission to prevent the use or proliferation of chemical weapons. It would entail destroying portions of Syria's stockpile, interdicting shipments and seizing other components. At minimum, it would require a no-fly zone and a significant campaign of air and missile strikes, according to the Times.

"Thousands of Special Operations forces and other ground forces would be needed to assault and secure critical sites," Dempsey wrote, according to the Times. He estimated it would cost well over $1 billion a month.

To date, the White House has limited its proposed military involvement in the conflict to supplying the rebels with small arms and other weapons. The plan has recently been supported by both the House and Senate Intelligence Committees.

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

After 'Interview,' Hollywood Scrambling for a Safe Villain

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 13:33 PM

Hollywood has a history of skewering overseas adversaries from Nazi Germany to communist Russia and, until recently, Mid . . .

Steve Lonegan: Donors Want to Know Where Jeb Bush Stands

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 12:31 PM

Lonegan appeared Friday on Newsmax TV’s “America’ Forum” where he discussed the GOP’s 2016 presidential race and critici . . .

Dershowitz, Hayden: Release 'Interview' for Free, Make Hackers Pay 'Heavy Consequence'

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 12:20 PM

Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz and former CIA Director Michael Hayden, on Newsmax TV on Friday, agreed that the S . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved