Tags: nra | un | civilian | weapons

NRA: UN Arms Treaty Must Exclude Civilian Weapons

Thursday, 12 Jul 2012 10:38 AM

By Newsmax Wires

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
The National Rifle Association has demanded that the United Nations leave civilian weapons out of a treaty on international arms sales that it is negotiating this month.

Wayne LaPierre, the group’s CEO, warned Wednesday that the treaty won’t pass Congress if it does include restrictions on civilian arms, as this would trump Americans’ right to bear arms under the Second Amendment, The Hill reports.

He said 58 senators have promised to oppose a treaty, that covers civilian weapons. A U.N. treaty would need approval from two-thirds of the Senate to become law in the United States.

Urgent: Get the Truth About President Obama — Click Here Now

“I am here to announce NRA's strong opposition to anti-freedom policies that disregard American citizens' right to self-defense. No foreign influence has jurisdiction over the freedoms our Founding Fathers guaranteed to us,” LaPierre said at the U.N Arms Trade Treaty Conference.
.
“The only way to address NRA's objections is to simply and completely remove civilian firearms from the scope of the treaty. That is the only solution. On that, there will be no compromise.”

The 58 senators cited by LaPierre signed a letter to President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on the issue. Written by Sens. Jerry Moran, R-Kansas, and Jon Tester, D-Mont., it doesn’t reject regulation of civilian arms sales but indicates it would be difficult for Congress to pass a treaty including civilian arms.

The senators oppose “any inclusion of small arms, light weapons, ammunition or related materials that would make the treaty overly broad and virtually unenforceable,” the letter says.

The senators can’t accept a treaty that “in any way restricts the rights of law-abiding U.S. citizens to manufacture, assemble, possess, transfer or purchase firearms, ammunition and related items.”

Treaty proponents say keeping civilian weapons out of the agreement would make it easier for terrorists and rogue regimes to gain deadly arms. And, they say, there’s no need to worry about the Second Amendment, as the Constitution trumps international law.

Urgent: Get the Truth About President Obama — Click Here Now


© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Video Purports to Show Beheading of US Journalist

Tuesday, 02 Sep 2014 13:18 PM

An Internet video purports to show the beheading of U.S. journalist Steven Sotloff by the Islamic State group.Sotloff, w . . .

ISIS Condemned For 'Ethnic-Cleansing' in Iraq

Tuesday, 02 Sep 2014 12:52 PM

Amnesty International has accused Islamic State jihadists of systematic ethnic cleansing and mass killings of minoriti . . .

Walid Phares: Indecision Is Obama's Decision

Tuesday, 02 Sep 2014 12:46 PM

President Barack Obama has had plenty of strategy options for combating the Islamic State (ISIS) in the Mideast, but he  . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved