Federal Judge Orders IRS to Explain How it Lost Lerner Emails

Thursday, 10 Jul 2014 06:45 PM

By Cathy Burke

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
A federal judge has ordered the IRS to explain how it lost two years' worth of emails from a former official at the center of a tea party targeting scandal – and said he'd assign a magistrate to determine if the data can be recovered from other sources, reports say.

U.S. District Judge Emmitt Sullivan gave the tax agency until Aug. 10 to submit a sworn declaration about Lois Lerner's missing emails; the IRS has said the information was lost when Lerner's computer crashed in 2011.

Sullivan also said he'd assign federal Magistrate John Facciola to look into other ways to obtain the missing records from other sources.

Vote Now: Do You Think Romney Should Run Again?

The ruling came Thursday as part of a Judicial Watch lawsuit against the agency; the conservative group complains the IRS never disclosed it was missing Lerner's emails from 2009-2011.

The Hill reported Sullivan's order may be a compromise allowing Judicial Watch to get the information it's requested under the Freedom of Information Act without further court action. 

The group wanted the court to force IRS officials, if necessary, to testify about the missing data.

But it's unclear how much more data can be unearthed, The Wall Street Journal reported. 

The IRS has insisted it's reconstructed some 24,000 of Lerner's emails from other sources, including other workers' computers.

Lerner's computer hard drive apparently was recycled and shredded under a standard federal contract.

According to The Hill, Department of Justice lawyer Geoffrey Klimas argued the federal court should only weigh in after the Treasury Department's inspector general for tax administration finishes its probe into the missing emails.

Sullivan said the IRS's declaration next month should outline how that investigation affects the court proceedings.

Afterward, Judicial Watch claimed victory, The Hill reported.

"In our view, there has been a cover-up going on," said Tom Fitton, Judicial Watch's president, after the hearing. "The government needs to be transparent. And part of transparency is telling people when there's a problem."

Vote Now: Do You Think Romney Should Run Again?

Related Stories:

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

UPDATE 3-U.S. Courts Deliver Conflicting Rulings on Obama Health Care Law

Tuesday, 22 Jul 2014 13:54 PM

 . . .

Ruddy: Pat Buchanan Discovers the GOP 'Comeback' in Nixon

Tuesday, 22 Jul 2014 13:46 PM

I just finished reading Pat Buchanan's new book about Richard Nixon and his surprise 1968 “comeback” win for president. . . .

Hatch’s Conditions on Inversion Law Spotlight Partisan Gap

Tuesday, 22 Jul 2014 13:37 PM

Legislation to deter U.S. companies from moving their addresses overseas should avoid retroactive taxes, prevent a net t . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved