Karzai Rebuffs Elders in Push to Delay U.S.-Afghan Agreement

Image: Karzai Rebuffs Elders in Push to Delay U.S.-Afghan Agreement

Sunday, 24 Nov 2013 03:56 PM

 

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Afghan President Hamid Karzai continued to resist U.S. demands to sign a security accord before April presidential elections even after tribal elders urged him act without delay.

“The U.S. waited for two years, but can’t wait for only five months more -- why are they in a hurry?” Karzai said yesterday in Kabul after about 2,500 elders, intellectuals and politicians endorsed the deal following four days of talks. “After we are assured we have guaranteed peace and security in the whole country, and secure elections, I will sign it.”

Karzai’s delay threatens to torpedo a deal that would keep some U.S. troops in Afghanistan beyond 2014, jeopardizing billions of dollars in aid money and threatening an increase in violence throughout the region. President Barack Obama wants the deal concluded by year’s end to have enough time to plan for an extended military presence.

“I can’t imagine a more compelling affirmation from the Afghan people themselves of their commitment to a long-term partnership with the United States and our international partners,” U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said in a statement commenting on the assembly’s action. He said the “critical next step” is to get the agreement signed in “short order.”

U.S. patience with Karzai’s demands is wearing thin, according to an American official. With the endorsement yesterday, it’s time for the Afghan government to make a final decision, said the official, who asked not to be identified discussing the state of U.S.-Afghan relations.

After 2014

The proposed agreement would let some U.S. forces stay to train Afghan soldiers and conduct counterterrorism operations after combat troops leave by the end of next year. The U.S. now has 48,000 troops in the country, and the coalition of allies has an additional 27,000, according to the U.S. Defense Department.

“We can’t possibly have further U.S. military presence there without an agreement in place,” Jay Carney, Obama’s spokesman, told reporters on Nov. 22. Earlier that day, Karzai spokesman Aimal Faizi said no U.S. deadline is acceptable.

Sibghatullah Mojaddedi, a former president heading the assembly known as a loya jirga, called on Karzai to quickly sign the agreement.

The security pact was “endorsed by the members,” Mojaddedi said yesterday. “The president must give us promises he would sign it sooner because the pact will benefit the country.”

Home Raids

In his speech, Karzai again criticized the U.S. for operations in Afghan homes. The agreement would be broken if the operations in homes are conducted “once more,” he said.

Obama said in a Nov. 20 letter to Karzai that U.S. troops will conduct raids on Afghan homes only “under extraordinary circumstances involving urgent risk to life and limb of U.S. nationals.”

The agreement would provide the U.S. with access to nine bases at Kabul: Bagram, Mazar-e-Sharif, Herat, Kandahar, Helmand, Gardez, Jalalabad and Shindand. While allowing the bases is “very hard emotionally and rationally,” Karzai said, the country is obliged to do so given the current volatile security situation.

Taliban Opposition

The Taliban yesterday sought to reassure India, China and Russia that a withdrawal of U.S. troops wouldn’t threaten regional stability. Instead, the group said the U.S. presence is the source of conflict, according to a statement.

“We are unequivocally opposed to any American military presence in Afghanistan and we will continue our armed struggle until Afghanistan regains its full sovereignty and all foreign military forces leave our country,” Zabiullah Mujahid, a Taliban spokesman, said in the statement.

Karzai said yesterday he is concerned that his legacy may suffer should the agreement fail to provide security. Term limits bar him from standing for election again and extending his 12 years as Afghanistan’s leader.

“If I sign it today and tomorrow we don’t have peace, who would be blamed by history?” Karzai said. “So that is why I am asking for assurances.”


© Copyright 2014 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

NYC Police Commissioner: Hatchet Attack Was Terror

Friday, 24 Oct 2014 16:44 PM

New York City police Commissioner William Bratton says the hatchet attack on four rookie officers was a terrorist act by . . .

Upstate NY Voters Not Letting Cuomo Tiptoe Around Gun Control

Friday, 24 Oct 2014 16:37 PM

New York’s gun laws passed after the 2012 school massacre in Newtown, Conn., have become an issue in Democrat Gov. Andre . . .

Top Doc Assesses Ebola Threat on 'Meet the Doctors'

Friday, 24 Oct 2014 15:53 PM

The wall-to-wall media coverage of the Ebola crisis should not let us lose sight of the fact that the flu and other infe . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved