Tags: court | wiretapping | law | us

High Court Will Hear Suit Challenging Wiretapping Law

Monday, 21 May 2012 11:24 AM

 

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
 The U.S. Supreme Court will consider whether lawyers and civil rights activists can pursue a challenge to a federal law allowing government surveillance of international phone calls and Internet communications.

The justices today agreed to hear the government’s bid to throw out the lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union, representing Amnesty International and a group of lawyers, international rights activists, journalists and other plaintiffs.

The groups asked a New York federal court to rule that 2008 amendments to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act violate the Constitution by allowing the monitoring of international communications by Americans who aren’t suspected of criminal or terrorist activities. The law protects companies such as AT&T Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc. from lawsuits claiming they let the government use their networks for improper wiretaps.

The case before the high court involves questions about whether the ACLU and its allies can pursue their lawsuit, and doesn’t address the constitutionality of the wiretapping law itself.

The Obama administration is seeking to have the case dismissed, saying those who sued lacked legal standing because the law, aimed at monitoring communications by non-Americans outside the U.S., doesn’t directly apply to them. The government said there was no evidence they suffered harm from surveillance by U.S. intelligence agencies.

Testing U.S. Powers

“The constitutionality of the government’s surveillance powers can and should be tested in court,” Jameel Jaffer, the lead ACLU lawyer on the case, said in an e-mailed statement. “We are hopeful that the Supreme Court will agree.”

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York said the lawsuit could proceed. It said the U.S. lawyers, activists and journalists were affected because their conversations may be tapped if they were on the other end of an international call with someone targeted for surveillance.

The appeals court said a belief that their communications could be intercepted prompted “costly and burdensome measures” to ensure confidentiality, such as traveling long distances for face-to-face talks that otherwise could have been conducted by telephone or e-mail.

The Justice Department said the appeals court set an overly lenient test.

Surveillance concerns by the ACLU and other groups are “completely speculative,” the government said. Allowing them to sue over the expense of guarding against the possibility that their conversations may be monitored lets them “establish standing through self-inflicted injury,” the Justice Department said.

Stricter Standards

The New York appeals court’s decision to let the case proceed conflicts with stricter standards applied by courts in other parts of the country, the government said.

The 2008 law requires the government to get authorization from a special Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to establish wiretaps.

The law’s requirements are so minimal, the ACLU argued, that they amount to a “blank check” permitting surveillance without showing the targets are “connected in any way, however remotely, to terrorism.”

Lawyers are in effect required, as a matter of professional ethics, to avoid telephone calls and e-mails for confidential communications protected by attorney-client privilege, the ACLU said.

The justices will hear the case in the term that begins in October.

The case is Clapper v. Amnesty International USA, 11-1025.

--Editors: Laurie Asseo, Jim Rubin

To contact the reporter on this story: Bob Drummond in Washington at bdrummond@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Steven Komarow at skomarow1@bloomberg.net

© Copyright 2014 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Oscar de La Renta, Designer for First Ladies, Celebrities, Dies at 82

Monday, 20 Oct 2014 22:01 PM

Oscar de la Renta, the worldly gentleman designer who shaped the wardrobe of socialites, first ladies, and Hollywood sta . . .

CEO of French Oil Giant Total Killed in Moscow Plane Crash

Monday, 20 Oct 2014 22:44 PM

The CEO of French oil company Total, Christophe de Margerie, died in a plane crash at a Moscow airport after his private . . .

Obama to Sharpton: Dems in Key Races Support Me

Monday, 20 Oct 2014 22:31 PM

Some Democrats running for re-election or challenging Republican incumbents in next month's midterm elections have dista . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved