Cleta Mitchell: Proposed IRS Changes Should Not Be Done Secretly

Friday, 23 May 2014 04:04 PM

By Courtney Coren

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
    A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
The fact that the Internal Revenue Service is going to revise regulations affecting the political speech of nonprofit groups is "obviously a win," but the federal agency should handle the matter differently, says Washington attorney Cleta Mitchell.

"What I wish they would have said is 'we realize that people feel very strongly about this, and we're not going to issue any regulations on this,'" Mitchell told J.D. Hayworth and Morgan Thompson on "America's Forum" on Newsmax TV.

"I wish they would have said that 'if we do decide that we need regulations, we're going to have hearings first and hear what people have to say, and we're not going to continue this process in secret behind closed doors,'" she said. "So that's the part that worries me, is what are they going to do next?"

Story continues below video.



The IRS released a statement Thursday saying that it will rewrite regulations that were proposed at the end of 2013 that place further limits on the political speech and activity of nonprofit groups, a move that angered conservative groups, who said it restricted their free speech rights. The IRS reportedly received a record number of negative feedback about the proposed regulation, leading the agency to decide to make a change.

However, the IRS only plans to hold one public hearing on what those revised regulations will be, and that will not take place until after the regulations are published.

Mitchell said that this is not how it is supposed to be done.

"Every agency, every federal agency is supposed to publish online and you're supposed to be able to look and see what regulations they're working on," she explained. "Except, they didn't do that. They didn't add this rule making to their plans until two days before they issued it."

The Washington attorney said that the reason the IRS must function in such secrecy is because "the things that they do and the things that they're trying to do cannot withstand the scrutiny in the light of day."

And that is why she is not optimistic about what Mitchell thinks they will come up with.

"I have no reason to think that they're going to change their stripes and now all the sudden be concerned about the First Amendment and protecting First Amendment rights," the Washington attorney explained. "I think they're just going to issue something that's going to be equally deplorable and we're going to have to fight them again and then we'll probably have to sue them."

Related Stories:





© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Obama Executive Order Gives Pay Raise to Federal Workers

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 22:36 PM

Federal workers and uniformed military service members are getting a 1 percent pay boost. . . .

Mental Illness History Ruled on Appeal to Not Bar Gun Ownership

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 22:14 PM

A federal appeals court concluded that a history of mental illness shouldn't bar citizens from owning a weapon in a firs . . .

China Arrests US Aid Worker on North Korean Border

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 21:56 PM

China has arrested an American Christian aid worker based near its border with North Korea, his lawyer said Saturday, as . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved