Cleta Mitchell: Proposed IRS Changes Should Not Be Done Secretly

Friday, 23 May 2014 04:04 PM

By Courtney Coren

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
The fact that the Internal Revenue Service is going to revise regulations affecting the political speech of nonprofit groups is "obviously a win," but the federal agency should handle the matter differently, says Washington attorney Cleta Mitchell.

"What I wish they would have said is 'we realize that people feel very strongly about this, and we're not going to issue any regulations on this,'" Mitchell told J.D. Hayworth and Morgan Thompson on "America's Forum" on Newsmax TV.

"I wish they would have said that 'if we do decide that we need regulations, we're going to have hearings first and hear what people have to say, and we're not going to continue this process in secret behind closed doors,'" she said. "So that's the part that worries me, is what are they going to do next?"

Story continues below video.



The IRS released a statement Thursday saying that it will rewrite regulations that were proposed at the end of 2013 that place further limits on the political speech and activity of nonprofit groups, a move that angered conservative groups, who said it restricted their free speech rights. The IRS reportedly received a record number of negative feedback about the proposed regulation, leading the agency to decide to make a change.

However, the IRS only plans to hold one public hearing on what those revised regulations will be, and that will not take place until after the regulations are published.

Mitchell said that this is not how it is supposed to be done.

"Every agency, every federal agency is supposed to publish online and you're supposed to be able to look and see what regulations they're working on," she explained. "Except, they didn't do that. They didn't add this rule making to their plans until two days before they issued it."

The Washington attorney said that the reason the IRS must function in such secrecy is because "the things that they do and the things that they're trying to do cannot withstand the scrutiny in the light of day."

And that is why she is not optimistic about what Mitchell thinks they will come up with.

"I have no reason to think that they're going to change their stripes and now all the sudden be concerned about the First Amendment and protecting First Amendment rights," the Washington attorney explained. "I think they're just going to issue something that's going to be equally deplorable and we're going to have to fight them again and then we'll probably have to sue them."

Related Stories:





© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Cornyn: House to Pass 'Skinnied Down' Bill to Aid Border Crisis

Monday, 28 Jul 2014 07:14 AM

House Republicans intend to pass skinnied down emergency funding legislation this week before the August recess to add . . .

Justice Department Seeks to Protect Files of Anti-Iran Group

Monday, 28 Jul 2014 07:06 AM

A federal lawsuit by Greek shipping magnate Victor Restis is on pause while the Justice Department tries to prevent him  . . .

Israel Resumes Strikes in Gaza as UN Calls for Ceasefire

Monday, 28 Jul 2014 06:22 AM

A relative lull descended on the war-torn Gaza Strip at the start of a major Muslim holiday on Monday, as international  . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved