Tags: burgess | obamacare | delay

Burgess to Newsmax: 'Other Shoes to Drop' on Obamacare

Tuesday, 02 Jul 2013 11:43 PM

By Todd Beamon

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Rep. Michael Burgess told Newsmax on Tuesday that “there are clearly other shoes to drop” as the deadline nears for the implementation of Obamacare.

“I don’t think it’s the end of it,” the Texas Republican said, referring to the Obama administration’s decision to delay until 2015 a requirement that employers offer health insurance or else face stiff penalties.

“I just cannot believe that they’re not having meetings and discussions and email exchanges on contingency plans,” Burgess told Newsmax in an exclusive interview. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius “has been pretty refractive in divulging any of that information to Congress,” he said.

“We saw today that they’re clearly planning to narrow the scope. We just don’t at this point know how much or what other parts are at risk.”

Under Obamacare, companies with 50 or more workers must provide affordable coverage to their full-time employees or risk escalating tax penalties if just one worker ends up getting government-subsidized insurance.

The rule was expected to take effect on Jan. 1 but was delayed until 2015, after next year’s congressional elections.

Burgess, an obstetrician, questioned whether the White House could delay such a critical portion of Obamacare without congressional approval.

“We all know this thing has problems,” he told Newsmax. “Here they are, trying to dig out from a problem that they have caused — and I’m not sure if they can do it, purely as an administrative function. You actually might need legislative action to go with it.”

Long an Obamacare critic, Burgess added: “This whole thing is bad, from start to finish. I’ve never have been able to get the Secretary of Health and Human Services to admit that they’re having discussions on contingency plans, but you know that they are.

“Here is one of the contingencies that they thought they should deal with, lest it become a bad political liability going into next year, which is an election year. They backed off.”

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Retype Email:
Zip Code:
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Report: On Eve of 9/11, Clinton Said He 'Could Have Killed' bin Laden

Thursday, 31 Jul 2014 17:59 PM

Former President Bill Clinton gave a speech in Australia revealing he once could have killed Osama bin Laden, but deci . . .

Ex-CIA Officer: ISIS Most Dangerous Security Threat to US

Thursday, 31 Jul 2014 17:16 PM

Former Central Intelligence Agency officer Gary Berntsen tells Newsmax TV that the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS . . .

Steve Forbes: Return to Gold Standard Would Give Dollar 'Stable Value'

Thursday, 31 Jul 2014 18:30 PM

A return to the gold standard would stabilize and strengthen the U.S. economy, says Steve Forbes, chairman and editor-in . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved