Tags: ballot | california | eggs

California Animal Rights Proposal Splits Humans

Tuesday, 28 Oct 2008 02:56 PM

By Phil Brennan

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink

Calif. Animal Rights Plan Splits Humans

By Phil Brennan

A California ballot measure designed to expand animal rights would all but kill egg production and raise the price of eggs in the Golden State, opponents say.

The measure, Proposition 2 on the ballot, prohibits the practice of caging animals such as chickens, sows, and veal cattle.

“This is a well-intended initiative for animals with some very negative unintended consequences for people,” Julie Buckner, a spokeswoman for Californians for Safe Food, the leading anti-Proposition 2 group, told The Associated Press. “It’s going to wipe out the California egg farmers, and it’s going to raise the food costs for consumers. And this is at a time when our economy is hurting.”

“Wealthy, narrow-minded elitists” who do not understand its real-world consequences are pushing the measure, Buckner told AP.

“This is an organization raising money from upper-middle-class white women writing $100 checks,” she said.

The measure's supporters however, deny those objections, claiming that Proposition 2 is an act of kindness for those animals whose bodies and byproducts are dining-room fare.

“If animals are going to be killed for food, the least we can do is treat them with decency and give them a semblance of life,” Wayne Pacelle, the president and chief executive of the Humane Society of the United States, told AP.

Both parties agree that the ballot issue will prove to be the most expensive and probably the most bruising animal-rights campaign ever, according to AP. The Humane Society alone has contributed about $4 million for the campaign for Proposition 2, about half of what Pacelle thinks his side will spend before the Nov. 4 election.

Californians for Safe Food, however, raised more than $6.7 million by the end of September, federal election documents show. Scores of donations have come from agricultural operations around the country, including egg companies in Colorado, Georgia, and Minnesota who fear they might see similar measures in their states.

California is the nation’s fifth-largest producer and No. 1 consumer of eggs, producing an estimated $337 million worth in 2007, AP explained. Nationwide, the country produces about 77 billion table eggs a year — 250 per American — valued at about $6.7 billion.

Ads by supporters, show images of abused animals on so-called factory farms, while opponents’ commercials have warned that the measure would lead to the importation of unsafe eggs from Mexico, AP said.

Opponents say that Proposition 2, which would require that animals be provided room to turn around, lie down, stand up, and fully extend their limbs, could expose birds, via contact with their own waste and that of other animals, to such dreaded diseases as salmonella and avian influenza. Standard egg-laying cages, which the AP said are little more than 8 inches square, actually protect hens from aggression by other birds and predators.

Dr. Nancy D. T. Reimers, a poultry veterinarian who has been paid for her work for Californians for Safe Food, told AP that people often do not understand the work that veterinarians do on farms.

“The folks that are involved in the food supply know what we have to do to keep the animals and the food safe,” Reimers said. “And they are, by and large, opposed” to Proposition 2.

The economic slowdown also could affect the campaign, AP noted. although polls have shown Proposition 2 leading, veterinarian William Grant, said he was surprised at how many people had expressed concern about “the fiscal impact on the state, rather than how we care about the animals.”

“Had this been up last year, I think this would have overwhelmingly passed without any discussion,” said Grant, a veterinary surgeon in Garden Grove who is president of the California Veterinary Medical Association. “But in some ways, the fear of the unknown is the greatest fear, and that may be affecting how they’re looking at this. In fact, I know it is.”

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

White House: Hamas Attack 'Barbaric' Violation of Gaza Ceasefire

Friday, 01 Aug 2014 08:56 AM

The White House on Friday condemned a reported Hamas attack on Israeli soldiers in Gaza as a violation of the newly reac . . .

Job Growth Cools, Unemployment Rate Rises to 6.2 Percent

Friday, 01 Aug 2014 08:34 AM

U.S. job growth slowed more than expected in July and an unexpected rise in the unemployment rate pointed to some slack  . . .

Panel: Military Cuts Leave US Too Weak to Handle 'Global Threats'

Friday, 01 Aug 2014 08:32 AM

President Barack Obama's policy of shrinking the military has left the United States too weak to handle the multiple dan . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved