Tags: Iran | Will | deal | better | war

George Will: Iran Nuclear Deal Better Than War

Thursday, 05 Dec 2013 11:19 AM

By Melanie Batley

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
There are plenty of reasons to criticize the nuclear deal the Obama administration brokered with Iran, but the agreement is still better than going to war to try to stop the country's nuclear proliferation, Pulitzer Prize winning columnist George Will says.

It's legitimate to argue that the deal will be ineffective in stopping Tehran's nuclear development, Will argues in an op-ed in the New York Post, but containing a nuclear Iran is still preferable to a waging a likely disastrous, and ultimately futile, war.

A policy of containment, he says, is America's only realistic option.

"Some advocates of war seem gripped by Thirties Envy, a longing for the clarity of the 1930s, when appeasement failed to slake the dictators' thirst for territorial expansion. But the incantation 'Appeasement!' is not an argument," Will writes.

"And the word 'appeasement' does not usefully describe a sober decision that war in an imprudent and even ultimately ineffective response to the failure of diplomatic and economic pressures to alter a regime's choices about politics within its borders."

Congressmen on both sides of the House are arguing against a deal with Iran and are likely to clash with the White House over a reduction in sanctions.
 
But Will says that one element that makes the deal a success is that it constrains Israel from attacking Iran; a worthy aim, given Israel's military is ill-equipped to successfully take on its foe and an attack would do little more than stall Iran's nuclear program by a few years at most.

"The agreement will not stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons; only a highly unlikely Iranian choice can do that. The agreement may, however, prevent a war to prevent Iran from acquiring such weapons," Will writes.

He adds that even a U.S. attack could not prevent reconstitution of its program, and advocates of an invasion should recall our "disastrous" entanglement with Iraq and then consider that Iran has almost three times the population of Iraq and is nearly four times the size.

"We have two choices, war or containment. Those who prefer the former have an obligation to clearly say why its consequences would be more predictable and less dire than those in the disastrous war with Iraq."

Related stories:

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Republicans Call For Swift Action Against ISIS

Tuesday, 02 Sep 2014 21:28 PM

Republican lawmakers sounded a clarion call for quick, decisive action against Islamic State (ISIS) militants after the  . . .

Obama Sending 350 More Troops to Protect US Embassy in Baghdad

Tuesday, 02 Sep 2014 21:03 PM

President Barack Obama has ordered about 350 more troops to Baghdad to protect the U.S. Embassy in the Iraqi capital and . . .

Ex-NSA Chief: JPMorgan Hack May Be a Warning From Putin

Tuesday, 02 Sep 2014 20:57 PM

Hackers who stole gigabytes of data from JPMorgan Chase Co. may have been trying to send a message that U.S. financial . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved