Tags: Robert | Reich | Value | Added | Tax

Reich: Value Added Tax Is a Bad Solution to Big Deficit

Thursday, 22 Apr 2010 02:00 PM

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
    A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Economists Martin Feldstein and Robert Reich agree a value added tax (VAT) is a poor solution to America's deficit problems.

“Any tax that hides itself is not a good tax,” Reich says, and VATs are hidden because most are levied on production, which means consumers don’t know how much tax they are paying.

Reich, who served in three national administrations and was a secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton, told CNBC that he is also concerned about the VAT’s inherently regressive nature because it takes equally from the rich and the poor.

Feldstein agrees with Reich that a VAT would be regressive. “Half of all Americans who file tax returns don’t pay any tax, but they would pay a value added tax every time they bought something,” he says.

Feldstein would like to limit the Obama administration’s tax cuts for everybody below the top two tax brackets and reduce spending.

“We don’t want to have a 100 percent reduction in the taxes as proposed by the administration for everybody under $200,000,” he says. “That would cost more than $2 trillion over the next 10 years.”

Reich says there’s some room to raise marginal income taxes on the top income levels.

“Let’s remember that under Dwight Eisenhower, whom nobody ever accused of being a radical, the rate was 91 percent (and) the effective rate was closer to 60 percent,” says Reich, now a professor of public policy at the University of California at Berkeley.

Reich suggests creating a separate capital or investment account in the federal budget for the part of domestic discretionary that is really public investment like infrastructure and education, and doing some major trimming in defense expenditures in years to come.

Reich and Feldstein also agree that Medicare and Social Security are the two biggest federal budget concerns.

“We need to stop financing those 100 percent by taxes … and move to a mixed system in which we combine some tax finance … with an investment-based part,” Feldstein says.

“I think that’s the direction we should be going.”

© 2014 Moneynews. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Karl Rove: New Congress Will Be Effective, Bipartisan

Thursday, 18 Dec 2014 08:15 AM

The 114th Congress could demonstrate that bipartisanship is possible by building on Democratic support for legislation r . . .

Pakistan Shaken to Core by Taliban School Massacre

Thursday, 18 Dec 2014 08:06 AM

The horrific attack Tuesday that left 132 schoolchildren dead at the hands of Muslim extremists has strongly affected Pa . . .

Uncompromising Putin Blames US For Economic Woes

Thursday, 18 Dec 2014 07:59 AM

President Vladimir Putin struck an uncompromising stance over the crisis gripping Russia, accusing the U.S. and European . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved