Rampage Prompts Political Maneuvering

Saturday, 15 Jan 2011 07:06 AM

 

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink

WASHINGTON (AP) — Democrats, Republicans and independent groups across the ideological spectrum are seeking political profit from the shooting rampage that left six dead and Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords wounded, often moderating their rhetoric in pursuit of their goals.

Often, but not always.

Two days after shootings, the conservative Tea Party Express issued a fundraising appeal that said accused gunman Jared Loughner's actions in the months leading to the shooting were "more consistent with Blame America First Liberals, not the tea party movement."

For their part, Democrats acted quickly to inject politics into the shooting. Within hours of last Saturday's gunfire, they circulated a posting from Sarah Palin's 2010 campaign website that showed crosshairs superimposed on Tucson, Ariz., and several other regions of the country, part of her effort to defeat incumbent Democrats who had voted for President Barack Obama's health care legislation.

In an interview the following day, Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, referring to the crosshairs as well as Palin's combative rallying cry of "Don't retreat; reload," said: "These sorts of things, I think, invite the kind of toxic rhetoric that can lead unstable people to believe this is an acceptable response."

Republicans rebutted, moving to shield their tea party supporters from any guilt by association with an accused gunman with a troubled past. "What we know about this individual, for example, is that he was reading Karl Marx and reading Hitler. ... That's not the profile of a typical tea party member and that's the inference that's being made," said Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn.

The jockeying coincided with a formal cease-fire on partisan activity in Congress, as well as with bipartisan calls for greater civility when lawmakers return to work and debate the issues that divide them.

House Republicans canceled a debate and vote that had been scheduled for midweek on a bill to repeal the health care law, an event that could well have erupted into partisan fury. "An attack on one who serves is an attack on all who serve," said Speaker John Boehner, an Ohio Republican sworn into office less than a week before the shootings.

Obama ordered flags at federal buildings lowered to half-staff and led the nation in a moment of silence. He flew to Tucson to speak at a memorial service not far from the hospital where Giffords and other wounded victims were being treated.

"At a time when our discourse has become so sharply polarized — at a time when we are far too eager to lay the blame for all that ails the world at the feet of those who happen to think differently than we do — it's important for us to pause for a moment and make sure that we're talking with each other in a way that heals, not in a way that wounds," he said.

More than any individual politician, Palin, the 2008 Republican vice presidential candidate and a possible White House contender in 2012, figured in the political jockeying that unfolded in the days after the shooting.

Initially, an aide seemed to agree with a radio interviewer who said the crosshairs were surveyors' markings, but the page from Palin's website was removed without explanation.

At midweek, the potential presidential candidate released a videotaped statement, drawing attention to herself in the hours leading to Obama's widely anticipated speech. "Acts of monstrous criminality stand on their own," she said in the seven-minute video that showed her seated in front of a stone fireplace, an American flag visible in the background. "They begin and end with the criminals who commit them, not collectively with all the citizens of a state, not with those who listen to talk radio, not with maps of swing districts used by both sides of the aisle."

She defended her own words and actions, noting that she had said while campaigning in Arizona last year, "We know violence isn't the answer. When we take up our arms, we're talking about our vote."

At the same time, she said: "Especially within hours of a tragedy unfolding, journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very hatred and violence that they purport to condemn. That is reprehensible."

Her statement sparked fresh criticism, though. Jewish leaders quickly pointed out that the phrase "blood libel" had roots in false and anti-Semitic charges that Jews once killed Christian children to use their blood in religious rituals.

Former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, another likely 2012 presidential contender, distanced himself from Palin at one point during the week, saying the map markings like the ones on her website weren't his style. But he also agreed on one key point with the woman who enjoys wide support among conservatives likely to vote in next year's primaries, saying, "There is no evidence to suggest that it (the shootings) had anything to do with this mentally unstable person's rage and senseless act in Arizona."

On the other side of the political aisle, liberal Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who is seeking re-election next year, distributed a fundraising appeal to constituents that detailed threats against Arizona Democratic lawmakers in addition to Giffords. It asked whether "right-wing reactionaries, through threats and acts of violence, intimidated people with different points of view from expressing their political positions" in the state.

He drew criticism from conservatives, mirroring the reaction against Palin's more widely reported video statement.

Some of the jockeying was more subtle.

Within two days of the attacks, the liberal Media Matters Action circulated a memo titled "Arizona's Eighth District Epitomized Over-The-Top Demonization Of Liberals," an unflattering compilation of comments and actions by Giffords' political rivals over the past two years.

It cited vandalism of Giffords' congressional office hours after she voted for health care legislation and an interview in which her 2010 Republican opponent, Jesse Kelly, said liberalism was 'ripping this country apart. . It's time to engage the enemy. . It's time for them to be afraid of us."

© Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Report: US Special Forces Attempted to Save Journalist Before Beheading

Wednesday, 20 Aug 2014 19:30 PM

U.S. Special Forces attempted to free James Foley, the American journalist beheaded by ISIS, earlier this summer, but Fo . . .

Christian NY Farm Owners Fined $13K for Refusing Same-Sex Wedding

Wednesday, 20 Aug 2014 19:48 PM

A Christian couple who owns a farm in upstate New York has been fined $10,000 and ordered to pay two women $1,500 each f . . .

Pete Hoekstra to Newsmax: ISIS 'Needs to Be Eliminated'

Wednesday, 20 Aug 2014 19:01 PM

The United States can best respond to the beheading of American journalist James Foley by Islamic State (ISIS) militants . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved