Tags: Shariah | threat | law | constitution

The Shariah Threat to America

By Fred Grandy   |   Wednesday, 26 Dec 2012 01:32 PM

There is a great deal of misinformation circulating with regard to shariah and the threat it poses to America and western civilization.

Some misinformed observers and members of the Muslim Brotherhood liken concerns over shariah to prejudice and bigotry, but the facts say otherwise.

Terrorism experts in the law enforcement, military and intelligence communities have cited shariah as the jihadists’ enemy threat doctrine in an intensive study called “Shariah: The Threat to America,” a scholarly, 352-page book based on authoritative sources of shariah, or Islamic law. While shariah does include “prayer and fasting” and “worship” as Thomas cites, it is also an all-encompassing legal and political code that covers aspects of life that have nothing to do with religion.

Alert: Will Boehner, Obama Avoid the Fiscal Cliff? Vote Here

Perhaps most importantly, unlike other forms of religious law, such as canon law and Jewish law, shariah is the only form of religious law extant that is also meant to apply to people of other faiths, i.e. non-Muslims.

The threat from shariah has nothing to do with prejudice or bigotry. The threat from shariah is real and multifaceted.

Some claim that shariah is no threat to the American legal system, but research shows such a threat does exist. Just as shariah has gradually become embedded in the legal systems of many European nations over the past generation, it is beginning to be found in U.S. court cases. An initial study by the Center for Security Policy entitled “Shariah Law and American State Courts: An Assessment of State Appellate Court Cases,” examined 50 cases from 23 states that involved conflicts between shariah and American state law. The study’s findings suggest that shariah has entered state court decisions, in conflict with the Constitution and state public policy.

This incursion of shariah into U.S. court systems usually manifests itself in the form of foreign law from nations such as Pakistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Sudan, Libya, Syria and other predominantly Islamic nations. As a result, four states, Tennessee, Louisiana, Arizona and Kansas, have passed into law “American Laws for American Courts,” legislation. Several more states are considering American Laws for American Courts. Unlike Oklahoma’s infamous constitutional amendment, American Laws for American Courts does not ban shariah. American Laws for American Courts protects individual, fundamental constitutional rights by preventing courts from applying foreign law when the application of that foreign law in the case at hand would result in the violation of a fundamental constitutional right, such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, due process and equal protection.

Among the organizations clouding the issue on shariah is the Saudi-backed Islamic Society of North America (ISNA).

ISNA was named as an unindicted co-conspirator and revealed to be a Muslim Brotherhood affiliate in the U.S. vs. Holy Land Foundation, the largest terrorism financing prosecution in American history.

ISNA was co-founded in 1981 by Sami Al-Arian, a man who is now in federal prison after having been convicted on terrorism charges as a member of Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

According to two reports in the San Francisco Chronicle, the other co-founder of ISNA, Mahboob Khan, twice hosted Ayman al-Zawahiri on fundraising trips here in the USA.

In addition, a regional representative for ISNA, Abdurahman Alamoudi, was found to be a chief fundraiser for al-Qaida here in the USA and was convicted on terrorism charges. Alamoudi founded the Islamic Society of Boston using ISNA’s tax-exempt, non-profit status.

ISNA board member Muzammil Siddiqi told the San Francisco Chronicle in June 2001 that he “supported laws in countries where homosexuality is punishable by death."

Alert: Will Boehner, Obama Avoid the Fiscal Cliff? Vote Here

Siraj Wahhaj, who served as vice president of ISNA, is on record as supporting all aspects of shariah, including its call for brutal punishments like the removal of one's hands as the penalty for theft, and death by stoning as the penalty for adultery. According to Wahhaj, such harsh measures are wholly justified by Islamic scripture as he preached in a May 1992 sermon: “I would cut off the hands of my own daughter [if she stole] because Allah stands for Justice.” On another occasion, Wahhaj stated: “If Allah says 100 strikes, 100 strikes it is. If Allah says cut off their hand, you cut off their hand. If Allah says stone them to death, through the Prophet Muhammad, then you stone them to death, because it’s the obedience of Allah and his messenger — nothing personal.”

Islamic scholar Stephen Schwartz has described ISNA as "one of the chief conduits through which the radical Saudi form of Islam passes into the United States."

These hardly seem like the kind of people who should be leading interfaith outreach in the USA.

Fred Grandy is a Republican former four-term member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Iowa. He was also an actor, best known for his role as Gopher on "The Love Boat" and the former CEO of Goodwill Industries International.

© 2015 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

1Like our page

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved