Tags: Ryan | budget | Brooks | Feulner | Kristol

Brooks, Feulner, Kristol Endorse Rep. Ryan's Budget Plan

Wednesday, 28 Mar 2012 03:48 PM

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Three leading conservatives have come out in favor of Rep. Paul Ryan’s “Path to Prosperity” budget, praising it for its focus on “the true drivers of our spending crisis” and for its recognition that tax increases would damage the economy.

Arthur Brooks, president of the American Enterprise Institute; Edwin Feulner, president of the Heritage Foundation; and William Kristol, editor of The Weekly Standard and a director of the Foreign Policy Initiative, wrote in an Op-Ed in The Wall Street Journal that in an election year it is easy for politicians to wait until after the votes are counted to make the hard choices.

“House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R., Wis., has taken the more difficult road with his ‘Path to Prosperity’ budget,” they wrote.
“Mr. Ryan's plan has received much attention for tackling America's spiraling expenditures on entitlements and domestic discretionary spending. Less reported is the budget's partial restoration of national defense as the No. 1 priority of the federal government.”

The three say that even though the plan will cut spending by $6.2 trillion over the next 10 years, Ryan has found a way to replace $214 billion of the $487 billion in cuts for the military in President Barack Obama’s budget.

“Conservatives recognize that they have to deal with fiscal reality and get the federal government's balance sheet in order,” they write. “That is why Mr. Ryan's plan is so bold. It does not cut indiscriminately, focusing instead on the true drivers of our spending crisis and recognizing that tax increases would worsen our economic situation.”

Obama has been arguing that the nation must decide between “higher taxes and a weaker defense.”

“Instead, Mr. Ryan takes some important first steps toward facing up to the true drivers of the federal government's money woes: spending through ‘entitlement’ programs. These now consume roughly 60 percent of the federal budget, up from 20 percent in 1970. In contrast, national defense, which comprised nearly 40 percent of the budget in the 1970s, costs less than 20 percent today, even with current war spending. Absent reform, entitlements will spiral upward and crowd out all other federal spending — not just on the military.”

Failure to reform entitlements will lead to the United States becoming “a European-style—and unsustainable—welfare state.”

“If we want a strong America in a dangerous world, and a freer and growing economy for our citizens, it's time to choose the direction that Mr. Ryan is charting,” they conclude.

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Ex-Soldier: My Friendly-fire Shots Might Have Killed Pat Tillman

Sunday, 20 Apr 2014 07:41 AM

A former U.S. Army Ranger who was in the same platoon as ex-NFL player Pat Tillman has stated in a television interview  . . .

Pope Seeks to Bring Faith to 'Ends of the Earth'

Saturday, 19 Apr 2014 18:26 PM

Pope Francis baptized 10 people Saturday and urged them to bring their faith to the ends of the Earth as he presided o . . .

Conservatives Deride Effort to Rig Electoral College

Saturday, 19 Apr 2014 19:37 PM

Conservatives slammed the campaign to effectively end the Electoral College's role in presidential elections, saying tha . . .

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved