Tags: Emerging Threats | Russia | Ukraine Revolution | Ron Paul | Russia | Crimea | Ukraine

Ron Paul: 'Why Does US Care' About Crimea?

Tuesday, 18 Mar 2014 07:31 PM

By Jason Devaney

The United States should not be so concerned with Crimea’s decision to secede from Ukraine, Ron Paul writes in a commentary for USA Today.

Urgent: Do You Approve Or Disapprove of President Obama's Job Performance? Vote Now in Urgent Poll

"Why does the U.S. care which flag will be hoisted on a small piece of land thousands of miles away?" writes for the former congressman from Texas.

Paul has been all over the news regarding the Ukraine crisis, and his message has remained the same: stop blaming Russia.

"This whole thing that Putin is the big cause of the trouble is pretty good evidence that the Europeans as well as the American government have contrived to have the overthrow of a government that most people say had been elected," Paul said on the Fox Business Channel last week.

The week before that, just after the crisis began on the Black Sea peninsula, Paul told Fox's Neil Cavuto that a $1 billion aid package proposed by the Obama administration to help Ukraine was the wrong move.

"It always backfires," he said. Paul said aid packages, in his view, rarely reach the people that need them most.

In his USA Today commentary, Paul questions deep U.S. involvement — and interest — in the situation that has resulted in Crimea's becoming part of Russia. He even drew a comparison to Iraq.

"What's the big deal? Opponents of the Crimea vote like to point to the illegality of the referendum," Paul writes. "But self-determination is a centerpiece of international law. Article I of the United Nations Charter points out clearly that the purpose of the U.N. is to ‘develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples.’

"Critics point to the Russian ‘occupation’ of Crimea as evidence that no fair vote could have taken place. Where were these people when an election held in an Iraq occupied by U.S. troops was called a ‘triumph of democracy?’"

Paul added that the Constitution does not allow the U.S. government to participate in overthrowing a foreign government. He also mentioned the "minimal" sanctions the Obama administration has put on Russia, which include freezing the U.S. assets of seven Russian officials.

Obama vowed to "impose further sanctions" if Russia continued its actions.

"Neither the U.S. nor the E.U. can afford significant sanctions against Russia," Paul countered in his commentary. "Global trade provides too much economic benefit to both sides."

Related Stories:

© 2015 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Experts: Iran Now a Nuclear-Ready State, Missiles Capable of Hitting US

Sunday, 01 Feb 2015 18:30 PM

Regardless of intelligence uncertainties and unknowns about Iran's nuclear weapons and missile programs, we know enough  . . .

Ben Carson: Obama Letting Islamists 'Destroy Us'

Sunday, 01 Feb 2015 16:26 PM

Dr. Ben Carson, an expected GOP presidential contender, said he wants to see the size of government reduced if he one da . . .

Justice Department Probes Moody's for Mortgage Deal Grades: WSJ

Sunday, 01 Feb 2015 17:32 PM

The U.S. Department of Justice is investigating Moody's Investors Services for issuing favorable grades on mortgage deal . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved