Rand Paul's Non-Interventionist Foreign Policy Position Popular, for Now

Image: Rand Paul's Non-Interventionist Foreign Policy Position Popular, for Now

Tuesday, 24 Jun 2014 09:12 AM

By Melissa Clyne

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
    A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Tea party Republican Rand Paul’s non-interventionist approach to foreign policy appears to be gaining traction with battle-fatigued Republicans, but whether the majority of the party will support that position for the long haul remains a question, according to Washington Post political writer Aaron Blake.

Blake cites a December Pew Research poll that found 53 percent of Republicans — slightly more than Democrats — believe the United States should "mind its own business internationally," up from the 22 percent who felt that way after 9/11.

Members of the GOP also strongly favored going to war in both Iraq and Afghanistan, but those feelings have faded over time, with just 4 in 10 Republicans in 2013 saying the wars weren’t worth fighting, according to Blake.

Paul, a senator from Kentucky, has said America is now suffering the consequences of its decision to occupy Iraq, which he characterized June 22 on CNN's "State of the Union" as a "Jihadist wonderland … because we got overinvolved, not because we had too little involvement."

Paul has been vocal about his objection to using military force as a first option and has decried U.S. involvement in both Syria and the Ukraine-Russia conflict, according to Fox News.

But whether members of the GOP will feel the same way over time, "when Republicans actually see a reason for foreign involvement that [Paul] doesn't necessarily agree with," is the great unknown, Blake writes.

"It's easy to say the United States should mind its own business when wars are unpopular and people no longer see the immediate urgency of overseas missions," he said. "If the wrong issues are at the forefront and Paul errs too much on the side of non-interventionism, he could find himself marginalized."

Widely seen as a 2016 presidential candidate, Paul has sparred in the media in recent days with former Vice President Dick Cheney, an unapologetic architect of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, who has referred to Paul as an "isolationist" who doesn’t understand the gravity of the consequences should the United States stay on the sidelines.

"That didn't work in the 1930s, it sure as heck won't work in the aftermath of 9/11, when 19 guys armed with airline tickets and box cutters came all the way from Afghanistan and killed 3,000 of our citizens," Cheney said on ABC's "This Week."

Related Stories:

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Steve Lonegan: Donors Want to Know Where Jeb Bush Stands

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 12:31 PM

Lonegan appeared Friday on Newsmax TV’s “America’ Forum” where he discussed the GOP’s 2016 presidential race and critici . . .

Dershowitz, Hayden: Release 'Interview' for Free, Make Hackers Pay 'Heavy Consequence'

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 12:20 PM

Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz and former CIA Director Michael Hayden, on Newsmax TV on Friday, agreed that the S . . .

FBI Blames NKorea For Sony Hacking: 'Act of Intimidation'

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 11:18 AM

The cyber-terrorists behind the attack on Sony Pictures Entertainment sent a message to studio execs late Thursday givin . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved