Lawyers Dispute Obama’s Claim of 'Judicial Activism'

Tuesday, 24 Apr 2012 09:44 AM

By Greg McDonald

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Two lawyers who represent 26 states seeking to have Obamacare overturned are warning that a Supreme Court decision upholding the purchase mandate for health insurance would open the door to other government-imposed mandates across a variety of industries.

Writing in a Wall Street Journal op-ed piece Tuesday, the lawyers, David R. Rivkin Jr. and Lee A Casey, also take issue with President Barack Obama’s assertion that a decision striking down the mandate would amount to an act of “judicial activism” on the part of the justices.

“If Congress can regulate Americans as future consumers (and everyone is a future consumer in dozens if not hundreds of markets), then it could equally impose any number of mandates on the citizenry today as a means of regulating the transactions in which they are expected to engage tomorrow, next week, or in 40 years,” said Rivkin and Casey.

Taken to the extreme, they said a Supreme Court ruling upholding the Obamacare requirement that Americans must purchase health insurance or be penalized could force consumers to prepay for all sorts of commodities and services.

True, they suggested, such mandates would drive more people into a market and might result in lower costs. But they insisted the idea of government forcing “prepayment mandates” on people is simply unconstitutional and would fare no better in the United States “than it did in the Soviet Union.”

“Although the policy merits of various mandates could be honestly debated, there simply is no neutral, judicially enforceable basis on which courts can determine which prepayment mandates Congress can impose as a means of regulating future transactions and which it cannot,” the two wrote.

“If, as in this case, Congress persists in adopting legislation that goes beyond its constitutional authority, the courts must invalidate it,” they continued. “That is not judicial activism. It is the fulfillment of the judiciary’s constitutional duty.”

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Peter King: FBI 'Going All Out' to Find ISIS Would-Be Terrorists

Thursday, 18 Sep 2014 13:49 PM

FBI Director James Comey is "going all out" to find would-be terrorists in the United States who were sympathetic to the . . .

Pope Francis: Christians Joining Jews in Suffering Religious Persecution

Thursday, 18 Sep 2014 13:44 PM

It is Christianity's turn to suffer religious persecution, Pope Francis told a World Jewish Congress delegation visiti . . .

US Intelligence Director Disputes Allegations He Lied Over Snowden

Thursday, 18 Sep 2014 13:27 PM

James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, denied Thursday that he lied to Congress about government surveill . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved