WSJ Editorial: 'Lawless Rewrite' Proves Obamacare Hurts Economy

Tuesday, 11 Feb 2014 06:26 AM

By Elliot Jager

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Without statutory authority, and in contravention of the wording of the Affordable Care Act, the Obama administration has delayed the mandate on businesses with 50 or more workers to provide their employees with insurance, The Wall Street Journal editorialized.

Calling the Affordable Care Act "Obamacare" is apt because "the law increasingly means whatever President Obama says it does on any given day," the Journal said. The 2010 Affordable Care Act requires companies with 50 full-time workers to provide insurance coverage beginning in 2014. This requirement was shifted to 2015 last year.

Editor's Note: Govt Prohibited From Helping Seniors (Shocking)

Now, the law will not be implemented until 2016. Another alteration: Businesses with more than 50 employees need only to show they are offering coverage to 70 percent of full-time workers. The "latest lawless rewrite," the newspaper editorialized, is of "dubious legality" because the ACA states that the mandate takes effect "after Dec. 31, 2013."

Only the U.S. Congress can alter a clear-cut statutory mandate, "but then this president has often decided the law is whatever he says it is."

Employers had warned that implementing Obamacare would damage job creation. Liberals were disdainful of this admonition.

"Well, which is it? Either Obamacare is ushering in a worker's paradise, in which case by the White House's own logic exempting businesses from its ministrations is harming employees. Or else the mandate really is leading business to cut back on hiring, hours and shifting workers to part-time as the evidence in the real economy suggests," said the Journal.

In taking these latest measures, Obama's administration has demonstrated a bias for "corporations over people." The individual insurance mandate has caused millions of people to lose their previous insurance coverage, the Journal editorialized.

"Liberals say the law isn't harming jobs or economic growth, but everything this White House does screams the opposite," the editorial concludes.

Editor's Note: Govt Prohibited From Helping Seniors (Shocking)

Related Stories:




© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

GOP Backing Off Support for Cliven Bundy After Racist Remarks

Thursday, 24 Apr 2014 11:12 AM

Republican leaders are backing off their support of Nevada cattle rancher Cliven Bundy after he made a series of inflamm . . .

AEI's Perle: Putin Trying to Put 'Humpty Dumpty Back Together'

Wednesday, 23 Apr 2014 19:51 PM

Time is of the essence in taking action against Russia for its military push into Ukraine because Russian President Vlad . . .

Three Americans Killed in Christian Hospital Attack in Afghanistan

Thursday, 24 Apr 2014 09:45 AM

Three Americans were killed on Thursday when a security guard opened fire at a Kabul hospital funded by a U.S. Christian . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved