Debate Renewed Over 'Presidential Qualification'

Friday, 15 Apr 2011 10:52 PM


  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink

PHOENIX (AP) — An Arizona bill that would require presidential candidates to prove their U.S. citizenship before they can appear on the state's ballot has rekindled a debate about the qualifications for running for the nation's highest political office.

The U.S. Constitution requires that presidential candidates be natural-born U.S. citizens, at least 35 years old and be a resident of the United States for at least 14 years.

However, the Founding Fathers didn't elaborate on "natural-born citizen," so the term has been left open to interpretation.

The U.S. Supreme Court also has never defined the phrase, said Gabriel J. Chin, a University of Arizona law professor who is an expert in citizenship and immigration law. "We have never been in a situation where we had somebody who there was a serious question about," he said.

Chin said the term was modeled after the term "natural-born subject" from British law, which applies to a person born in the land of a monarchy. The term appears as "natural-born citizen" in the U.S. Constitution to reflect a different form of government.

"It's hard to translate that into the concept of a republic," he said.

Chin said he and other legal scholars believe, for instance, that a person born in another country to American parents is eligible to run for president.

But not everyone agrees. And the issue becomes even more controversial when other scenarios are involved, like when one or both parents of a potential candidate are not legal U.S. citizens. Arizona's "birther" bill originally called for information on the citizenship of a candidate's parents, but that provision was removed.

In the case of U.S. Sen. John McCain, questions about his eligibility to run for president arose in 2008 because he was born in the Panama Canal Zone to U.S. citizens while his father was stationed there while serving in the military.

While the zone was under U.S. jurisdiction, it wasn't considered a U.S. territory in the same way Arizona was once a U.S. territory. At the time, children born there to American citizens weren't considered U.S. Citizens, Chin said.

But in 1937 — a year after McCain was born — Congress passed a law to retroactively grant citizenship to people born in the canal zone, because there was no doubt about whether they were citizens, Chin said.

Courts have thrown out claims arguing that McCain and President Barack Obama are not natural-born citizens.

© Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Retype Email:
Zip Code:
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

US Plans to Arm, Train Ukraine National Guard

Friday, 01 Aug 2014 23:20 PM

The Obama administration has notified Congress of its plans to train and arm the Ukrainian national guard next year, the . . .

House GOP Lauds Passage of 'Responsible' Border Bill

Friday, 01 Aug 2014 23:02 PM

House Republicans praised the passing of legislation that would give President Barack Obama $694 million to address the  . . .

Congress Approves $225 Million for Israeli 'Iron Dome' System

Friday, 01 Aug 2014 22:54 PM

Congress approved $225 million in emergency funding for Israel's Iron Dome missile defense system on Friday, sending t . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved