NOM President: IRS Ruling Forces Gay Marriage on States

Friday, 30 Aug 2013 11:09 AM

By Sandy Fitzgerald

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
The IRS is trying to force same-sex marriage "on an unwilling public" with its ruling that legally married gay couples may now file joint income tax returns, National Organization for Marriage President Brian Brown said Friday.
 
"The Treasury Department is grossly overstepping its authority," said Brown in a statement posted on the NOM website shortly after the IRS' announcement.
 
"This is a nation of laws. Only Congress has the authority to change the law," he said in the statement.
 
On Thursday, the Obama administration said that married gay couples living in all 50 states can file joint federal tax returns, even if local authorities don't recognize their marriages.

Urgent: Should Gay Marriage Be Legal? Vote Here in Urgent National Poll.
 
The decision by the Treasury Department implements the Supreme Court's decision in June to overturn part of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which had forbidden the Internal Revenue Service from allowing married homosexual couples to file jointly.
 
The government's decision is considered a victory by same-sex couples who were married in one of the 13 states or the District of Columbia that recognize such relationships, but now live in one of the 37 states that do not recognize them.

 
Brown and the NOM, however, do not consider the ruling a victory at all. NOM, in its statement, said the IRS ruling "continues a pattern of lawlessness across the nation where administrators and clerks have taken it upon themselves to interpret and rewrite laws as they pertain to marriage."

Further, NOM said that only federal and state lawmakers have the power to enact or rewrite law.
 
"The Obama administration is intent on forcing same-sex 'marriage' on an unwilling public," Brown said. "Congress alone has the responsibility of determining federal tax law."
 
Same-sex marriage opponent Bryan Fischer, the director of the issues analysis for the American Family Association, told The Washington Post that the ruling puts "enormous federal pressure now on states to conform to the IRS."
 
Further, he said that the Supreme Court's decision earlier this summer to strike down parts of the Defense of Marriage Act "placed an [improvised explosive device] under every state marriage amendment in the land."
 
"I predict we will very quickly see legal action in the 37 states that do not give legal recognition to same-sex marriage to force them to conform to federal policy on their tax forms, and you will get activist federal judges that will comply," said Fischer.
 
The IRS ruling also creates some complications for same-sex couples who live in the 37 states that don't recognize gay marriage, financial experts said Friday.
 
Where same-sex couples had filed federal and state tax returns as individuals before, they now have the option to file jointly, but may still be required to file state returns as individuals.
 
"There's going to be a cumbersome work-around," Nanette Lee Miller of Marcum LLP, a public accounting firm, told The New York Times
 
Marvin Kirsner, a tax lawyer for Greenberg Traurig, told the Times that states may also respond to the federal ruling with changes of their own, creating an even bigger headache when tax time rolls around.
 
"Most state income tax regimes begin with federal taxable income as the starting point," Kirsner. "These state taxing authorities will have to figure out how to deal with a same-sex married couple who file a joint income tax return for federal tax purposes. We will need to see guidance from each nonrecognition state to see how this will be handled."
 
The ruling may also have some implications for Obamacare because it means the income of legally married couples will be considered when determining eligibility for the law's Medicaid expansion and subsidies, reports the St. Louis Post-Dispatch

Urgent: Should Gay Marriage Be Legal? Vote Here in Urgent National Poll.
 
Thursday’s announcement that the federal government will give the same tax treatment to legally married same-sex couples as they do to straight couples may have ripple effects for the 2010 healthcare law.
 
Brian Haile, senior vice president for health policy for Jackson Hewitt Tax Service, told the Post-Dispatch that, for example, same-sex couples who each have an income of $40,000 may be eligible for the health law’s tax credits individually, but not if they marry and combine their incomes.
 
"If they marry, then they would lose eligibility because their income would be over the threshold for a household of two," said Haile.
 
 
 
 

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Top Leaders Briefed on White House Computer Hack

Thursday, 30 Oct 2014 13:04 PM

An attack by hackers on a White House computer network earlier this month was considered so sensitive that only a small  . . .

Cardinal Burke: Pope Cannot Change Christ's Teachings on Marriage

Thursday, 30 Oct 2014 12:50 PM

Cardinal Raymond Burke, prefect of the highest court in the Catholic Church, has said that despite recent murmurs that t . . .

Thomas Menino, Boston's Longest-serving Mayor, Dies at 71

Thursday, 30 Oct 2014 12:32 PM

Thomas Menino, whose folksy manner and verbal gaffes belied his shrewd political tactics to govern as Boston's longest-s . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved