Ex-A.G. Mukasey: Court Needs to Clarify Obama’s Comments

Wednesday, 04 Apr 2012 01:10 PM

By Martin Gould

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
A federal appeals judge was right to demand an explanation of President Barack Obama’s comments about whether the Supreme Court has the right to overturn his sweeping healthcare reforms, former attorney general Michael Mukasey says.

The only surprise is that Judge Jerry Smith demanded that the explanation should be a certain length — “three pages of single-space typing,” he told Fox News’ Martha MacCullum.

“What they’re saying is we don’t want some smart alecky offhand response, we want three single-spaced pages with a serious discussion. That is unprecedented,” said Mukasey, who served as George W. Bush’s attorney general for the last year of his presidency.

“Courts ask lawyers to back up their positions with briefs all the time,” said Mukasey on “America’s Newsroom.” “What’s unusual to me is that courts usually submit page limits, they say don’t submit more than two pages or three pages.”

Smith interrupted an argument by government attorney Dana Lydia Kaersvang on Tuesday as she argued a healthcare-related case before the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.

The judge, a Reagan appointment, said the court needed to know Obama’s position as to whether the court system has the right to overturn laws on constitutional grounds. “That’s not a small matter,” he told Kaersvang.

Mukasey pointed out that the president has authority over all departments of government including the Department of Justice, so Smith was within his rights to demand an explanation of Obama’s position.

He pointed out that Obama is a constitutional lawyer, which makes his argument even more relevant. “To say the courts owe deference to elected officials and that it is somehow improper and overreaching for a court to strike down a statute is wrong as a matter of history,” he said, pointing out that they have been judging since matters since 1803.

“But when the president calls that into question, the court, it seems to me, has every obligation to sit up and take notice.”


© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Scotland Rejects Independence, Votes to Stay in United Kingdom

Friday, 19 Sep 2014 01:24 AM

Scotland has chosen to stay in the United Kingdom, spurning independence in a historic referendum that had worried allie . . .

Early Results Show Scots Vote Against Independence

Thursday, 18 Sep 2014 22:37 PM

Early returns Friday showed Scotland voting against declaring independence from the United Kingdom. . . .

Senate Dems Block Cruz Bill to Strip Citizenship From Terrorists

Thursday, 18 Sep 2014 22:26 PM

The Senate has refused to consider Sen. Ted Cruz's bill that would strip Americans of their citizenship for joining the  . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved