Big Medicaid Changes in 2014 Under Obamacare

Wednesday, 01 Jan 2014 11:36 AM

By Elliot Jager

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Millions of Americans who consider themselves able-bodied and middle class will in 2014 find themselves covered by a remodeled Medicaid program that previously had the image of serving the poor and disabled.

People who live in the District of Columbia and the 25 states which have expanded Medicaid coverage under the Affordable Care Act will see Medicaid taking on a wider role in providing healthcare, The Washington Post reported.

From Wednesday, anyone in those places with an individual income of less than $15,856 a year, including childless adults, as well as families with earnings below $32,499 will be eligible for Medicaid coverage. Among those likely to seek Medicaid will be the unemployed, lower-paid workers, those just entering the job market and retirees who do not yet qualify for Medicare.

In states where Medicaid has not been expanded it will cover its usual catchment of children and those with very-low incomes as well as the elderly poor and handicapped.

The Supreme Court ruled in the summer of 2013 that the Obama administration could not compel states to expand their Medicaid services. The original plan was to use Medicaid expansion as part of a comprehensive Obamacare effort to provide all Americans with health coverage.

Starting in 2014, in all states, Medicaid will no longer factor personal savings — except for those in long-term care— in determining eligibility.

Medicaid presently covers more Americans than Medicare. Both programs were created by the Lyndon Johnson administration's Great Society legislation in 1965.

Matt Salo, who heads the National Association of Medicaid Directors, noted that "Medicaid — for all the good we think it does, and it does do a lot of good — does have a connotation," of being a program for the very poor, the Post reported.

Opponents of the expansion say it will encourage dependency on the government. "It is very bad social welfare policy," said Edmund Haislmaier, of the Heritage Foundation.

"You are taking people who are by and large young, healthy and perfectly capable productive members of society and encouraging them to become dependent on public assistance. This is the very last population you want to do that for."

Related Stories:


© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Ted Cruz: 'Political' Flight Ban Is 'Economic Boycott' of Israel

Wednesday, 23 Jul 2014 17:06 PM

President Barack Obama is using a Federal Aviation Administration ban on flights to Israel's largest airport as "an econ . . .

House Republicans Offer $1.5 Billion for Border Control

Wednesday, 23 Jul 2014 12:45 PM

Leading Republicans said on Wednesday they believe an extra $1.5 billion is the most Congress should spend through Decem . . .

Marco Rubio: States Should Determine Gay Marriage Laws

Wednesday, 23 Jul 2014 09:55 AM

Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio hasn't changed his stance on same-sex marriage, despite a judge's decision last week . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved