Frank Luntz: Cantor's Polling 'a Whopper for the Ages'

Image: Frank Luntz: Cantor's Polling 'a Whopper for the Ages'

Thursday, 12 Jun 2014 06:49 AM

By Elliot Jager

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Polls cannot forecast election outcomes with certainty. "They cannot and should not be used as infallible crystal balls," writes veteran Republican pollster and political consultant Frank Luntz in a New York Times op-ed.

Polling goes wrong when practitioners and clients forget that public opinion surveying is an art as well as a science. Republicans were unable to predict House Republican Majority Leader Eric Cantor's loss because the human element in the polling was missing; the sentiments that can't be captured by technology alone.

Cantor's pollster, McLaughlin & Associates, estimated that he would handily overcome tea party-aligned economist Dave Brat by 34 points. Cantor lost by 11 points. As mistakes go, "This was a whopper for the ages. McLaughlin didn't merely get it wrong; this was quantitative malpractice — a mind-blowing modern-day 'Dewey Beats Truman' moment."

Moreover, if it's true that Cantor's poll was disclosed to cower the opposition then "not only was the poll inaccurate, the tactic was inept" because it may have spurred Brat's camp to redouble its efforts, Luntz writes.

That said, polls are not infallible. Statistically, one in 20 get it wrong. Even when conducted by the book, 5 percent of all polls wind up on the wrong side of the margin of error.

What polls can do is provide insight into the thinking of a target audience. They are a snapshot of attitudes valid at the time the poll was taken. "Without qualitative insight — talking with voters face to face to judge their mood, emotion, intensity and opinion — polls can be inconsequential, and occasionally wrong," writes Luntz.

There is a limit to what can be illuminated by simply asking dispassionate "yes" or "no" questions. Today's pollsters provide not only public opinion surveying but also strategy and public relations. Yet to get a handle on voters' real aspirations and concerns pollsters need insights into, "What anxiety keeps them up at night? What will be weighing on their conscience when they pull the electoral lever?"

That can only be revealed through human contact, "asking the right questions of the right people, and demanding honest answers."

Related Stories:


© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Ebola Swat Team in New York City to Help Avoid Dallas Missteps

Friday, 24 Oct 2014 21:49 PM

A second team of federal disease fighters are flying into New York today to consult on the city's first Ebola patient, a . . .

Report: Non-Citizens' Votes Could Affect Senate Race

Friday, 24 Oct 2014 21:27 PM

Many non-citizens don't register or vote, but so many do that it could change the outcome of some of the neck-and-neck S . . .

VA Official First To Be Fired Over Falsified-Records Probe

Friday, 24 Oct 2014 19:27 PM

A top-level Department of Veterans Affairs official allegedly involved in falsifying records of how long ailing veterans . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved