Canada: Moving Oil by Trucks, Trains More Harmful Than Pipeline

Thursday, 08 May 2014 11:52 AM

By Wanda Carruthers

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Trucks and trains carrying oil from Canada to the U.S. Gulf Coast pose a greater environmental risk than the Keystone XL pipeline, said Gary Doer, Canada's ambassador to the United States.

A report by the U.S. State Department backs that up, Doer told MSNBC's "Morning Joe." He said the report states that transporting the oil above ground causes "higher emissions," "higher risks for people," and "higher costs."

"Somebody has got to stand up and say the oil is coming down. And it's either going to come down on a pipeline, or it's going to come down on rail, and it's going to come down on trucks. Somebody has to stand up and say that, because it's higher emissions the way it's coming down, as we speak today," Doer said Thursday.

Story continues below video.



It was "more energy efficient" to transport the oil through a pipeline than by rail or truck, Doer said. People who said "no" to the pipeline were actually saying "yes to higher greenhouse gas emissions," he explained.

President Barack Obama in April announced he was postponing indefinitely approval of the project. The Senate is debating bills regarding Keystone, with support from Republicans and Democrats, to move the project forward. Doer said Canadian officials "didn't think it would be that complicated" for the United States to approve the pipeline.

Doer suggested opponents of the pipeline originally believed "if you do not approve the pipeline, the oil will stay in the ground." He said that idea had "fallen like a house of cards."

"When you look out your window and see more tanker trucks, you see more tanker cars on railways, you should know it's a consequence, partially, of not approving a pipeline and having it go on rail," he said. "The oil is coming from Canada. The oil is coming from North Dakota and Montana. It's just the way it's getting to the Gulf Coast."

Environmental concerns about the route through Nebraska had been addressed, Doer maintained, and changes were subsequently approved.

"The highest standards for pipeline monitoring and surveillance and security were put in place and approved by the state of Nebraska and by the State Department in the U.S.," he said.

Related Stories:

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

White House: GOP May Try to Impeach

Friday, 25 Jul 2014 11:43 AM

One of President Barack Obama's top advisers says the White House takes seriously the possibility that House Republicans . . .

Rasmussen: US Voters Expect Another Cold War With Russia

Friday, 25 Jul 2014 12:19 PM

Most U.S. likely voters expect a Cold War-style relationship between the United States and Russia, according to a Rasmus . . .

Pope Francis to Visit US Next Year

Friday, 25 Jul 2014 12:07 PM

Pope Francis will make a three-day trip to the United States next year - his first visit since becoming Pope in March 20 . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved