Tags: Contraception Mandate | Supreme Court | Hobby Lobby | court | decision | WSJ

Sens. Ayotte, Fischer: Stop Distorting Hobby Lobby Decision

Image: Sens. Ayotte, Fischer: Stop Distorting Hobby Lobby Decision  New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte, left, and Nebraska Sen. Deb Fischer.

Wednesday, 16 Jul 2014 09:49 AM

By Melanie Batley

Nothing in the Supreme Court's Hobby Lobby ruling denies a woman access to birth control, and attempts to misrepresent the facts of the case and its impact on women are divisive and damaging, say New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte and Nebraska Sen. Deb Fischer.

In an opinion piece for The Wall Street Journal, the Republican lawmakers say that the decision was less about restricting birth control and more about upholding America's "centuries-old tradition of religious liberty."

"In the days since the Supreme Court's June 30 Burwell v. Hobby Lobby decision, we have been troubled by those who seem eager to misrepresent both the facts of the case and the impact of its ruling on women — all to divide Americans and score political points in a tough election year," the women wrote.

"Those who distort the court's decision insist that one cannot support religious liberty and also support access to safe, affordable birth control. But these are principles that we, and millions of others, support."

The lawmakers said that contraception remains readily available and accessible for all women, and the Hobby Lobby ruling will not change that. They also said that even before Obamacare, over 85 percent of large businesses offered contraceptive coverage to their employees, and the Obamacare mandate does not apply to businesses with fewer than 50 employees.

In addition, they said, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ensures that low-income women get access to contraception.

"With misinformation now swirling, it's important to understand what the court's decision doesn't mean," they wrote.

The senators emphasized that the decision was a narrow ruling that will only apply to businesses with a proven deeply held religious objection to the mandate, and was based on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act passed by a Democratically controlled Congress under former President Bill Clinton.

"When President Clinton signed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, he said: 'Our laws and institutions should not impede or hinder, but rather should protect and preserve fundamental religious liberties,'" they wrote.

"Congressional Democrats used to share that view. What's changed? We can preserve access to contraceptives without trampling on Americans' religious freedom."

Related Stories:

© 2015 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Robert Kagan: 5 Reasons Netanyahu Should Not Address Congress

Friday, 30 Jan 2015 10:12 AM

There are five reasons why Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should decline House Speaker John Boehner's invitat . . .

Hezbollah Leader 'Not Afraid' of War With Israel

Friday, 30 Jan 2015 10:07 AM

The leader of Hezbollah said on Friday his group did not want war with Israel but was ready for one and had the right to . . .

Morici: Obama 'Recovery' Pales Compared to Reagan's 500K Jobs Growth

Friday, 30 Jan 2015 09:14 AM

After a deep recession, Ronald Reagan posted 4.7 percent annual growth over 22 quarters and employment jumped 13 percent . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved