Rand Paul Backs Bundy in Nevada Standoff With Feds

Image: Rand Paul Backs Bundy in Nevada Standoff With Feds

Thursday, 17 Apr 2014 06:43 AM

By Elliot Jager

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul became the first 2016 GOP presidential contender to take a stand on the land battle between Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and the federal government, The Hill reported.

The libertarian-leaning Paul is siding with Bundy, though he said the matter should be settled in court.

On April 14, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat, weighed in on the issue. "It's not over," he told News4 in Reno. "We can't have an American people that violate the law and then just walk away from it. So it's not over."

The next day, in a radio interview with WHAS in Louisville, Paul said, "I think there's an opposite thing to what Harry Reid said, and that's the federal government shouldn't violate the law, nor should we have 48 federal agencies carrying weapons and having SWAT teams," according to The Hill.

The dispute involves land Bundy says his family homesteaded since 1877 and that the federal government says belongs to the United States. As part of a conservation effort to protect the endangered desert tortoise, the Bureau of Land Management announced in 1989 that the land could no longer be used for cattle grazing. Bundy continued to graze his cattle and refused to pay fines calling the federal policy a land grab, The Washington Post reported.

Paul argued that the land should be controlled by Nevada and local authorities, not by the federal government. He said the Bundy family had leased the land from the county and that federal officials should return it to local control, according to The Hill.

Over the weekend, Bureau of Land Management personnel withdrew from a confrontation with Bundy and his militia supporters, the Arizona Republic reported.

"Can everybody decide what the law is on their own? No, there has to be a legal process," Paul said. "But I think there is definitely a philosophic debate over who should own the land. I hope it'll go through a court. But if it were in a court, I would be siding and wanting to say that look, the states and the individuals in the state should own these lands," according to The Hill.

Related Stories:

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Hospital Mix-up Turned Away Ebola Patient

Wednesday, 01 Oct 2014 19:18 PM

Health officials scoured the Dallas area Wednesday for people, including schoolchildren, who came in contact with a Libe . . .

Jimmy Carter: I Would Have Beaten Reagan if I Had Been More 'Manly'

Wednesday, 01 Oct 2014 19:18 PM

Former President Jimmy Carter, who turned 90 Wednesday, says he would have been beaten Ronald Reagan and been re-elected . . .

Texas Appeals Court Upholds DeLay Reversal

Wednesday, 01 Oct 2014 18:26 PM

The highest criminal court in Texas refused Wednesday to reinstate two money-laundering convictions against former U.S.  . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved