Senators Question U.S. Aid to Pakistan Over Harboring Insurgents

Wednesday, 18 May 2011 08:39 PM

 

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink

Five Democratic senators asked the U.S. State and Defense Departments to assess Pakistan’s commitment to fighting terrorism before Congress approves more aid for that nation.

“It is incongruous to be providing enormous sums to the Pakistani military unless we are certain that it is meeting its commitment to locate, disrupt and dismantle terrorist threats inside its borders,” the lawmakers said in a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

President Barack Obama has proposed $1.2 billion in aid to Pakistan next year for programs including counter-insurgency training for its military forces. The senators are urging the Obama administration to gauge whether Pakistan’s government is working to cut support for extremist and terrorist groups, including al-Qaeda and the Taliban, that operate from its territory.

The senators signing the letter were Dianne Feinstein of California, Robert Menendez of New Jersey, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Max Baucus of Montana and Jon Tester of Montana.

They said they were “gravely concerned about the commitment of Pakistan’s security establishment to fighting terrorism.”

Yesterday, Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin said the U.S. should curtail economic aid to Pakistan unless that government stops harboring insurgent groups that target American troops in neighboring Afghanistan.

Haqqani Network

Levin, a Michigan Democrat, said continued financial support to Pakistan should hinge on whether the Pakistani military takes action against the Haqqani network, an Afghan Taliban-allied group based in Pakistan’s northwestern border region with Afghanistan.

“There is a real problem with continuing financial support for Pakistan when they continue to support the Haqqani network,” Levin told reporters in Washington yesterday. “These people are killing us. And this is open.”

Pakistan should also arrest members of the Quetta Shura, a group of Afghan Taliban leaders, thought to be based in Pakistan, Levin said.

Levin didn’t elaborate on what he would cut from U.S. economic aid to Pakistan. He said he would allow “certain kinds of military aid” to continue. In particular, he said he supports reimbursing Pakistan for securing the port where U.S. oil is delivered and subsequently the routes leading into Afghanistan where U.S. and NATO troops are fighting the Taliban. Levin said he is also willing to support Pakistani military training along the border regions with Afghanistan.

Corker and Risch

At a Senate Foreign Relations hearing yesterday, several other senators, including Republicans Bob Corker of Tennessee and James Risch of Idaho, as well as Democrats Chris Coons of Delaware and Menendez raised questions about U.S. aid to Pakistan.

Committee Chairman John Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat, is one of the architects of a 2009 bill that tripled non-military aid to Pakistan, committing $1.5 billion annually for five years. He briefed members of the Senate Democratic Caucus about his weekend trip to Pakistan and Afghanistan -- the first high- level official visit to that country since a team of U.S. Navy SEALs killed Osama bin Laden in Pakistan May 2.

While members from both parties questioned continued U.S. assistance to Pakistan, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and the Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell cautioned against threats to withdraw aid.

Withhold Judgment

Reid, a Nevada Democrat, said the U.S. should “withhold judgment” and wait for fact-finding. “We need a good relationship with Pakistan, and hope we can have a good relationship with Pakistan,” he said. “But this isn’t the time to start flexing our muscle.”

McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, warned against pulling back from Pakistan.

“I don’t think disengaging from Pakistan, a nuclear power, is in America’s best interests,” he said. “There are certainly, as we have learned, a lot of different factions in Pakistan, some of which are friendly to us and some of which are not. We knew that before the Osama bin Laden raid, we still know that.”

--With assistance from Laura Litvan in Washington. Editors: Laurie Asseo, Jim Rubin.

To contact the reporter on this story: Roxana Tiron in Washington at rtiron@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mark Silva at msilva34@bloomberg.net.

© Copyright 2014 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

In Reid's Senate, 4-Day Workweeks Rule

Friday, 19 Sep 2014 08:33 AM

The Senate adjourned Thursday for an extended break until November, having so far avoided this year to work a full week  . . .

WH Struggles to Sell ISIS Strategy to Skeptical Democrats

Friday, 19 Sep 2014 08:11 AM

The White House's plan to train and equip Iraqi ground forces for the fight against the Islamic State is being questione . . .

Clapper: ISIS, Like Viet Cong, Surprise With 'Will to Fight'

Friday, 19 Sep 2014 07:55 AM

While U.S. officials were spot on in predicting the Islamic State's "prowess and capability" and the Iraqi military's "d . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved