Report: Iran Attack Would Halt Nuclear Program for Four Years

Thursday, 13 Sep 2012 06:42 AM

 

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink

A U.S. or Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities would derail the Islamic Republic’s suspected weapons program for four years at most while uniting its citizens and alienating the Muslim world, according to a report.

The report to be released today by the “Iran Project,” a bipartisan group of former national-security officials and foreign-policy specialists, discusses the military pros and cons of a strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities and outlines the less- discussed political fallout of any such attack.

Air raids, commando assaults and computer network attacks “would destroy or severely damage many of Iran’s physical facilities and stockpiles,” according to the report. “But, in our judgment, complete destruction of Iran’s nuclear program is unlikely and Iran would still retain the scientific capacity and the experience to start its nuclear program again.”

Special:
Get Ed Klein’s "Amateur" for Just $4.95 With Special Offer – Save $23! Click Here Now

Military effectiveness notwithstanding, the New York-based group’s report concluded that “one of the most serious but difficult to quantify costs of military action against Iran could be damage to U.S. reputation and standing.”

“If Iran’s nuclear program is attacked by the U.S. or Israel in the absence of an international mandate or a multinational coalition, support for maintaining sanctions against Iran could be substantially weakened,” the report said.

Iran may retaliate by attempting to close the Strait of Hormuz, an action that would “rattle global markets and cause a significant spike in oil prices,” according to the report.

‘Destabilizing Forces’

An assault would “introduce destabilizing political and economic forces in a region already experiencing major transformations,” the report said. A U.S. strike may provoke worldwide anger among Muslims and enhance al-Qaeda’s ability to recruit new members, it said.

The report reiterates conclusions previously outlined by U.S. officials, including Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Admiral Michael Mullen, about the limited effectiveness of a military attack on Iran.

A U.S. air strike involving Northrop Grumman Corp. stealth B-2 bombers dropping 30,000 precision-guided penetrating bombs “carried out to near perfection” could delay Iran’s program by up to four years, according to the report.

A unilateral strike by Israel “with its more limited capabilities, could delay Iran’s ability to build a bomb by up to two years,” the report said. An Israeli airstrike “is unlikely to succeed in destroying or even seriously damaging” the deeply buried Fordo enrichment facility and the stockpile of near-weapons- grade enriched uranium there.

Noteworthy Signers

The “lack of a high-confidence military option against Fordo is a key reason why Israeli government officials believe they must take action to destroy Iran’s supply of low-enriched uranium and damage Iran’s ability to produce more centrifuges before Fordo becomes fully operational,” the report said.

Special: Get Ed Klein’s "Amateur" for Just $4.95 With Special Offer – Save $23! Click Here Now

The report may be more noteworthy for the former U.S. officials listed among its signatories, including former Central Intelligence Agency Deputy Director Paul Pillar; former U.S. Central Command commanders Marine Corps General Anthony Zinni and Admiral William Fallon.

Other signers of the report include former Republican Senator Chuck Hagel of Nebraska and former Democratic Senator Sam Nunn of Georgia; retired U.S. Ambassador Thomas Pickering; George W. Bush-era Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage and former National Security Adviser Brent Scowcroft.


© Copyright 2014 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Gen. Hayden: Obama's Lack of Participation on Intel Problematic

Tuesday, 30 Sep 2014 16:22 PM

President Barack Obama has attended only 42.1 percent of his daily intelligence briefings , and that could be dangerous  . . .

NY Times Cites 'Missteps' in Obama's Handling of ISIS Advance

Tuesday, 30 Sep 2014 16:04 PM

The White House's "misjudging" of the powerful threat from ISIS continued to drive news coverage Monday as its spokesman . . .

Asia Expert: China Favors Rubber Bullets in Hong Kong, For Now

Tuesday, 30 Sep 2014 15:29 PM

China's handling of massive demonstrations in Hong Kong is in the riot-police stage, but could escalate to military forc . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved