Emperor Obama's Healthcare Bill Has No Clothes

Tuesday, 15 Dec 2009 05:17 PM

 

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Because of pressure from enraged Americans, the most pernicious features of Obama’s healthcare legislation have been stripped from his bill — for now at least. This is no time for complacency, however, because the liberals are trying to push back and get the provisions back in.

As the bill stands, it doesn’t have any teeth:

* Without the public option, the government does not have the financial clout to enforce the decisions of the new secretary of health about the care protocols to be followed. The left had hoped that the federal public option insurance company would put the private firms out of business and leave a single, governmental payer in place. This single payer could slice reimbursements to providers at will and bring them into line offering low cost, long waiting lists, and rationed medical care.

But with no expansion of Medicare to those older than 55 and no federal public option, the health secretary won’t have the power to force bad medical care down the throats of the American people.

* Relatively few new people will get health insurance. The costs of coverage are too high, the subsidies too shallow, and the punitive fines too low to force people to buy policies they don’t want and think they don’t need.

What young, childless couple is going to pay 8 percent to 12 percent of their income for insurance rather than just pay the $1,000 fine for not having coverage. Oddly, this bill is really just a tax on the uninsured.

* Without the feared flood of new patients into the system, the rationing that threatened may not be as bad as it once seemed. With only a few newly insured people, the long waiting lists and shortages of medical personnel Massachusetts is experiencing under Romney-care may not happen nationally.

* A special commission in the executive branch akin to the federal base closing commission that decides which military bases to shutter. But then they would be subject to congressional approval each year.

A former Health and Human Services secretary under a Republican president told me recently that he expects Congress to veto the cuts each year, so they never will really take effect. The savings won’t materialize and the additional costs of Obama’s program will be financed through even more deficit spending, he says. For example, he cites the refusal of Congress each year to approve the automatic 6 percent cut in physician fees, which the legislative branch has laid over for each of the past five years.

What’s left is a bill that expands Medicaid to cover more of the poor and working poor. It requires that all states cover everyone making 150 percent or less of the poverty level. This will end the practice in many states of restricting Medicaid, in practice, to the elderly in nursing homes.

Arkansas, for example, covers only up to 17 percent of the poverty level (about $4,000 of income). Under the new law, anyone in the state whose income is less than about $27,000 will have to be covered. Of course, this provision will mean much higher state taxes throughout the South and in Texas, California, Pennsylvania, and Florida, states with low Medicaid thresholds.

The rest of the bill is essentially a consumer protection statute that bars insurers from denying coverage to anyone and stops them from charging more for those who are sick. Both the expansion of Medicaid and this reform of insurance company practices could have been achieved in considerably less than the 2,000 pages of dead trees that this bill consumed.

There are still bad parts of the legislation:

* Medicare Advantage, an important program for 10 million elderly will be gutted and replaced by Medigap insurance which is more limited in coverage, higher in cost, and more profitable to the AARP.

* Medical devices from pacemakers to automated wheelchairs still will be taxed, and sick people will be forced to pay higher taxes and deduct fewer of their medical costs.

* Reimbursements under Medicare are likely to continue to drop, forcing more and more providers to refuse to treat patients under the program.

So Obama is left with the symbol of a victory but not much substance. He still will sign the bill – if it ever passes – with great fanfare, but the substance of the legislation will be painfully thin.

We haven’t dodged the bullet yet. The left is still to be heard from. But the momentum against the bill and the focus on its worst provisions is paying off. Keep up the pressure!

© Dick Morris & Eileen McGann

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Dick Morris: Democrats Conspiring to Rig Electoral College, Law Passed in 9 States So Far

Tuesday, 15 Apr 2014 09:26 AM

A plan, now stealthily making its way through state legislatures with astonishing speed, would junk the Electoral Colleg . . .

Dodd-Frank Act Has Not Reformed Wall Street

Tuesday, 09 Aug 2011 14:53 PM

July 21 marked the anniversary of the passing of the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection act. Unfortun . . .

Obama's Legacy: Stagflation

Friday, 04 Mar 2011 16:49 PM

Obama's failure to support America's allies in the Middle East and his dithering endorsement of chaos in the region will . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved