After listening to President Obama's speech yesterday, I'd trust Bernie Madoff with my Medicare before I'd trust Obama.
The president portrayed himself as protecting seniors, and claimed Congressman Paul Ryan's plan would be cruel to seniors.
The data show the opposite. Seniors and baby boomers will be better off under the Ryan proposal than under the Obama health law.
The biggest winners are Americans under 55. They need to pay attention as Congress debates the budget. It is not about next year. It’s about Medicare a decade from now, when they will need it.
The Obama health plan reduces future funding for Medicare by $575 billion over the next 10 years and spends it on other programs, including a vast expansion of Medicaid. It’s robbing Grandma and Grandpa ala Bernie Madoff. The Ryan program stops the raid on Medicare.
In the year 2019, according to Medicare’s own actuaries, Medicare will spend $14, 731 per senior, under the Obama health law, instead of $16,162 if the Obama health law had not been enacted (Health Affairs, October, 2010).
Such cuts might be justifiable if the savings extended the financial life of Medicare. President Obama and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius frequently make that false claim. Even Medicare’s mailings to seniors repeat the lie that the spending reductions will make Medicare more financially secure. The truth is, Medicare is being bled dry, not saved, and the president is cooking the books.
While Ryan’s proposal also reduces future Medicare spending over the next decade, the differences are how the reductions are achieved and what is done with the “savings.” Ryan’s proposal stops the Medicare heist.
That’s good news for Americans who will turn 65 in 2022 or later. The Ryan proposal guarantees them a annual payment made by the federal government to the health plan of their choice. The payment will be equivalent to what Medicare would otherwise directly spend on care. On average, the premium paid will be $15,000 a year, just what Medicare projects to spend on average. The poor and chronically ill will get more help, to minimize out-of-pocket costs, while wealthiest seniors may get a smaller voucher if Congress decides to means test it.
Will $15,000 (adjusted upward for inflation) be enough? Ryan’s critics protest that the amount is inadequate and seniors will suffer. But $15,000 is what Medicare is predicted to spend per senior under the Obama health law. (Reminder: The Obamacare forecast is $14,731 in 2019 with inflation adjustments thereafter.)
Ryan offers seniors a guarantee. Clearly that’s better than a mere government forecast. Ryan’s “premium support” is modeled after how the Medicare Part D drug benefit currently works. Seniors have a choice, and the competition between drug plans has kept costs below what was predicted — nearly a first for a government program. The expectation is that the competition among private health plans will help do the same.
The shame is that Ryan’s proposal for guaranteed premium support wouldn’t start until 2022. The intent is to spare today’s seniors and baby boomers entering Medicare from sudden change.
Even without premium support, seniors will fare better between now and in 2022 under the Ryan proposal . By repealing the Obama health law, Ryan’s proposal eliminates the Independent Payment Advisory Board.
The Obama health law established IPAB to make further cuts beyond what are specified in the law. For the first time since Medicare was established in 1965, Congress ceded nearly all control of Medicare spending to this unelected board of cost-cutters. The rationale was to make Medicare budgeting immune from outraged seniors — destining seniors to get substantially less than the cuts already made.
Yesterday President Obama reiterated that that the knife wielding IPAB will be deciding what healthcare for seniors is "unnecessary" and what "services seniors need." The president said he won't cut favored programs such as Pell grants for college students and Head Start, but baby boomers and seniors beware.
The debate over Ryan’s 2012 budget proposal is not about preserving Medicare as we’ve always known it. That is already gone, eviscerated by the Obama health law. The choice now is about stopping the raid on Medicare’s finances and providing a believable guarantee to Americans under age 55 that they will have healthcare when they retire.
More Posts by Betsy McCaughey
© 2016 Newsmax. All rights reserved.