Tags: China | Car | Battery | a123

China Poised to Buy Car Battery Maker That Got $240 Million US Bailout

Friday, 12 Oct 2012 07:58 AM

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
A Massachusetts electric-car battery maker that got $240 million in U.S. government stimulus money is being saved from bankruptcy by a Chinese billionaire who could move the company overseas, FoxNews.com reported.

A123 Systems received a $241.1 million grant from the Obama administration three years ago and more than $125 million in Michigan state tax credits in the hopes that the company would create jobs.

"It’s money that we’ll never get back," Jarrett Skorup, a research associate with the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, said of the Obama administration, FoxNews.com reported.

"It was grant money so there were not a lot of strings attached to it."

"The problem is that policymakers decided to be in the business of picking economic winners and losers and unfortunately they've picked the losers far too often."

China's Wanxiang Group — owned by Chinese billionaire Lu Guanqiu — agreed in a tentative deal last August to invest $450 million in the company with the aim of gaining an 80 percent stake in the firm.

Despite financial support from Washington, the company lost an estimated $857 million, laid off workers, recalled its products and saw its stock price plunge to 26 cents this week from $4.44 a year ago.

Some experts say the Waltham, Mass.-based company may close up shop in the U.S. and open for business in China.

"Because of the weight of the batteries, it's much more cost effective to manufacture where they're going to be used in the vehicles," Pike Research analyst John Gartner told the Detroit Free Press.

Others questioned the deal — and the value of the company.

"It's not clear what the Chinese are going to get out of this," said Theodore O'Neill, founder of Connecticut-based Litchfield Hills Research and a former securities analyst who tracked A123, the Detroit Free Press added.

"There isn't any value here. There really isn't enough need for the product, and the product isn't profitable."

© 2014 Moneynews. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

US Court Tosses Argentina, Citigroup Appeal in Bond Case

Friday, 19 Sep 2014 19:16 PM

A U.S. appeals court on Friday dismissed an appeal by Citigroup Inc. and Argentina of a judge's order blocking the bank  . . .

S&P 500 Falls From Record, Alibaba Rallies; Oil Drops With Gold

Friday, 19 Sep 2014 16:38 PM

The Standard & Poor's 500 Index fell from a record, while small-cap shares sank and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. rallied i . . .

Gold Down, Silver at Four-Year Low on Strong Dollar, Equities

Friday, 19 Sep 2014 16:40 PM

Gold fell 0.8 percent on Friday to its lowest price since January, and silver slumped 3 percent to a four-year low as th . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved