Romney’s Flip-Flopping Continues to Weaken Him

Thursday, 27 Oct 2011 09:03 AM

By Lanny Davis

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Even before the first Republican debate, I have consistently stated in TV and print interviews that Mitt Romney would be the strongest Republican candidate against President Barack Obama.

Full disclosure: I am strongly supporting the president for re-election. I think he's done a good job starting out on his first day in the deepest economic hole faced by any president since FDR.

However, until recently, I believed that if the economic, unemployment, and right-track/wrong-track numbers are as bleak on Election Day 2012 as they are today, Romney stood a good chance of defeating Obama — and seemed to be the only Republican candidate with any real general-election appeal.

But in recent weeks I have changed my mind. In recent months and indeed, in the last several days, Romney has increased his already serious problem of being a flip-flopper and coming across as inauthentic, and also showed serious political tone-deafness as a non-compassionate conservative.

Several recent examples come to mind. There was Romney’s insensitive statement in Las Vegas last week — in a state with the highest foreclosure rate in the nation — that he wanted to allow home foreclosures to “hit the bottom” to help the housing industry recover.

That might be rational economic market theory — but it’s not an example of showing any empathy for the folks just blocks away from his press conference who are losing their homes to banks.

Next came the attack on Texas Gov. Rick Perry for supporting the children of illegal residents in Texas paying in-state tuition rates while attending Texas public colleges. But Romney apparently had forgotten that in Massachusetts, he had supported a healthcare law that guaranteed illegal residents of the Bay State access to tax-subsidized healthcare.

Then there was Romney going to Ohio two days ago and flip-flopping on his prior support for Gov. John Kasich’s law barring collective bargaining for public employee workers. Recently Ohio polls show a 25-point advantage for a referendum to repeal the law. So now Romney claimed that he had no position on the referendum.

Just a few days ago, Romney immediately criticized President Obama for his announcement that all U.S. military forces would be withdrawn from Iraq by Dec. 31, 2011. But he knew that the main reason for Obama's rather sudden announcement was the Iraqi government’s intransigence over many months of continuing the grant of legal immunity for U.S. soldiers risking their lives, an immunity that the U.S. government has always insisted on, regardless of the administration.

Yet Romney by innuendo suggested that Obama’s decision might have been politically motivated. In my view, that’s plain nasty.

Unless Romney (once again) flips and flops on these and other positions and is allowed to get away with it (which I don’t think he can), I believe this combination of flip-flops, insensitivity, and even nastiness is politically fatal for him or any other candidate.

The most recent polls bear out my instincts that Romney will likely lose to Obama in 2012 even with no improvement in the economy.

Given today’s high unemployment, low approval ratings, and high wrong-track/right-track numbers, it appears that things could hardly get any worse for Obama. Yet every recent poll shows Obama versus Romney as either in a dead heat (Rasmussen and Democracy Corps) or Obama ahead (+4 by AP, +3 by Time magazine).

A very recent poll in the crucial state of Ohio showed President Obama with a significant lead over Romney.

For this reason, I was confident enough to challenge Sean Hannity on Tuesday to take me up on a $1,000 bet that President Obama would be re-elected in 2012 — with the loser paying the money to the winner’s favorite charity.

Hannity immediately agreed.

So my message to my charity choice — the Washington, D.C., organization that cares for the homeless, So Others Might Eat: Expect a $1,000 check from Sean Hannity come Nov. 2012.

Lanny Davis is the principal in the Washington, D.C., law firm of Lanny J. Davis & Associates. He served as President Clinton’s Special Counsel in 1996-98 and as a member of President Bush’s Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board in 2006-07. He is the author of “Scandal: How ‘Gotcha’ Politics Is Destroying America” (Palgrave Macmillan, 2006). He can be found on Facebook and Twitter (@LannyDavis).

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Retype Email:
Zip Code:
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Hillary Uses 'Smart-Force' Negotiating

Thursday, 10 Apr 2014 09:21 AM

By the turn of the 21st century, it was clear that a new approach to the use of American power to protect our national i . . .

Raising Children Transcends Politics

Thursday, 03 Apr 2014 10:09 AM

I have been writing this column since the summer of 2008. My purpose was to write about issues and politics that focused . . .

Presumption of Innocence Must Apply to DC Mayor

Thursday, 13 Mar 2014 13:42 PM

The Washington Post’s five-column headline on Tuesday was: “Prosecutors: Vincent Gray Knew.” Note that the word “allege” . . .

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved