Romney’s Best Argument to Win in 2012

Tuesday, 28 Aug 2012 12:10 PM

By Lanny Davis

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
(This is the first of two columns pre-GOP and -Democratic conventions. This will present the best arguments that Mitt Romney can make for Americans to elect him over President Obama. The next column will present President Obama’s best arguments. The writer supports President Obama’s re-election.)

During his acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention, Mitt Romney should present three arguments for why he should be elected over President Obama.

But first he should state that President Obama is a good man, a good father, and husband and patriot who has tried hard to be a successful president. And he should give Obama credit for his bold and courageous leadership in bringing about the death of Osama bin Laden.

Then Romney should present three arguments based on facts that might persuade undecided and open-minded voters (probably about 15 percent of the likely voters watching) to pull the lever for him:

First, it is a fact that unemployment remains, as of July, at 8.3 percent — exactly the same as the percentage in February 2009, Obama’s first month as president. There can be no doubt, the answer to the most important question — “Are you better off today than you were four years ago?” — is, in fact, no.

Romney can argue that our political system should be based on accountability for performance, and that President Obama’s policies have failed with regard to the most important issue for all Americans in every poll — the economy.

Second, Romney can state the fact that under Obama, the national debt — which was $10.6 trillion on the day he took office — increased by over $5.4 trillion, to north of $16 trillion, with another $1 trillion in deficits proposed by the president in the next fiscal year.

In other words, despite all the increases in federal spending, Obama has nothing to show for it in reduced unemployment but has left our children and grandchildren with an unsustainable pile of credit card bills. That, Romney can argue, is a moral and economic policy failure.

Finally, Romney can point to a political situation that is even more polarized today than it was four years ago. This is a fact. Romney does not need to blame Obama for it. To be fair, as he must, he can and must accept the Republican share of responsibility for not meeting Obama halfway to negotiate compromises on both issues — the economy and the national debt — that concern American most; and for not agreeing with Obama, mutually and faithfully, to avoid demonizing each other over reasonable differences on policy.

But again, accountability suggests that Obama, as president — the one person under our Constitution elected by all the American people — should be held most responsible for the increased political polarization in our nation today, especially in light of his promises to do the opposite, which was the most inspiring theme of his 2008 campaign.

Ultimately, Romney cannot succeed in parlaying these three arguments into a victory over Obama unless he sets out his own alternative vision and plan to create jobs, reduce the debt — including embracing the across-the-board approach of raising revenues, cutting spending, and effecting entitlement reform of the president’s Bowles-Simpson Deficit Reduction Commission.

His vice presidential nominee opposed these recommendations. Now Romney can show his leadership of the ticket by endorsing them.

Regarding bipartisan solutions, which Americans want, Romney can point to his tenure as governor of Massachusetts, in which he showed an ability to work with Democrats in a Democratic-dominated legislature and, yes, can point to the healthcare bill passed in Massachusetts (which he says he rejects as a national solution) as an example of his ability to work on a bipartisan basis to obtain solutions.

It’s not enough to ask, “Are you better off today than you were four years ago?” The answer, of course, for most people, is no. Romney must do more — he must lay out his positive program, conservative but close to the center, that persuades most Americans to give his ideas a chance to do better. That is his best and only chance to win the presidency in 2012.

Lanny Davis is the principal in the Washington, D.C., law firm of Lanny J. Davis & Associates, which specializes in strategic crisis management. He served as President Clinton’s Special Counsel in 1996-98. Read more reports from Lanny Davis — Click Here Now.







© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Hillary Uses 'Smart-Force' Negotiating

Thursday, 10 Apr 2014 09:21 AM

By the turn of the 21st century, it was clear that a new approach to the use of American power to protect our national i . . .

Raising Children Transcends Politics

Thursday, 03 Apr 2014 10:09 AM

I have been writing this column since the summer of 2008. My purpose was to write about issues and politics that focused . . .

Presumption of Innocence Must Apply to DC Mayor

Thursday, 13 Mar 2014 13:42 PM

The Washington Post’s five-column headline on Tuesday was: “Prosecutors: Vincent Gray Knew.” Note that the word “allege” . . .

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved