Bill Clinton's Govt Shutdown Lessons

Wednesday, 25 Sep 2013 03:53 PM

By Lanny Davis

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Polls show that most Americans will blame House Republicans — not President Obama or congressional Democrats — if Speaker John Boehner and his tea party-driven caucus continue to insist that the president either defund Obamacare or shut down the federal government.
 
However, before Democrats celebrate prematurely, they should recognize a potential trap that former President Clinton was able to avoid after the two government shutdowns in late 1995 and early 1996. Clinton refused to go along with demands for substantial budget cuts by the Newt Gingrich-led Republican Congress, leading to the two shutdowns. And he came out way ahead politically and was re-elected in 1996 by a substantial margin.
 
In his must-read book, due to be published in the next several months, "The New Democrats and the Return to Power," Al From, founder and leader of the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC), explains how Clinton used the DLC’s “New Democrat” policy prescriptions to trump Gingrich and House Republicans.
 
Gingrich had calculated that the House GOP would win the old frame of Democrats as “pro-big government, deficits, and higher taxes” and Republicans as “pro-small government, balanced budgets, and lower taxes.” But Clinton had a different frame in mind.
 
Gingrich had miscalculated — he forgot that Clinton had chaired the DLC from 1990 to 1991 and won the presidency in 1992 running largely on the DLC’s New Democrat “third way” approach, and that he meant what he said and said what he meant.
 
On Nov. 13, 1995, the day that Clinton vetoed the Republican congressional budget resolution, leading to the first government shutdown, the president delivered a speech to the DLC convention and established the classic DLC “third way” frame.
 
“I think it is very important that you understand that this great debate in Washington is not, is not, about balancing the budget,” he said. “It is about balancing our values as a people . . . Five months ago, I proposed a balanced budget that eliminates the deficit, cut hundreds of wasteful and outdated programs, but preserves Medicare and Medicaid, invests in education, technology, and research, protects the environment and defends and strengthens working families. And it maintains the ability of the United States to lead the world toward peace and freedom and democracy and prosperity. My budget reflects those values and fulfills our interests. The Republican congressional budget simply does not.”
 
About two weeks later, in his 1996 State of the Union speech, Clinton reiterated the New Democrat message and cemented his political victory over the defeated House Republicans, when he famously announced to the nation: “The era of big government is over.”
 
As From writes in a draft manuscript of his forthcoming book: “Clinton had shifted the debate. It was no longer about the Republicans trying to force Clinton to accept a balanced budget. The showdown had allowed Clinton to convince the American people that he was indeed for a balanced budget, a significant part of convincing them he was a ‘different kind of Democrat’ he had promised to be. The debate was now about values and priorities — and Clinton would win that hands down.”
 
In 2013, Obama has a chance to follow a similar strategy and philosophical approach. He is right to oppose the House Republicans’ effort to defund his signature legislation, the Affordable Care Act, which I strongly support. But he should also endorse, for the first time, the recommendations of the Simpson-Bowles deficit reduction commission, which won widespread bipartisan support, including from conservative Republican Sens. Tom Coburn (Okla.) and Mike Crapo (Idaho) and progressive Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin (Ill.) and former Sen. Kent Conrad (N.D.).
 
If the president stakes out this position, he will do more than win decisively the current political battle with House Republicans. He will be honoring the moral obligation to substantially reduce the unsustainable $16 trillion debt, which currently represents the highest percentage of gross domestic product since just after World War II.
 
It is the right strategy and politics. It is also the right thing to do for our children, our grandchildren, our great-grandchildren, and our country.
 
Lanny Davis is the principal in the Washington, D.C., law firm of Lanny J. Davis & Associates, which specializes in strategic crisis management. He served as President Clinton’s Special Counsel in 1996-98. Read more reports from Lanny Davis — Click Here Now.
 

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Hillary Uses 'Smart-Force' Negotiating

Thursday, 10 Apr 2014 09:21 AM

By the turn of the 21st century, it was clear that a new approach to the use of American power to protect our national i . . .

Raising Children Transcends Politics

Thursday, 03 Apr 2014 10:09 AM

I have been writing this column since the summer of 2008. My purpose was to write about issues and politics that focused . . .

Presumption of Innocence Must Apply to DC Mayor

Thursday, 13 Mar 2014 13:42 PM

The Washington Post’s five-column headline on Tuesday was: “Prosecutors: Vincent Gray Knew.” Note that the word “allege” . . .

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved