Tags: aig | bailout

Absolute Transparency a Must for Bailout

Monday, 16 Mar 2009 01:47 PM

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink

Apparently, even under a forward-looking, honest, able, and liberal president, the forces of government are such that the public — like sheep meeting the shears — is being fleeced again.

The average citizen is terrified about the future and does not fully comprehend the implications of all of the bailout money — trillions of dollars — that is being handed out to the business institutions. Those in charge of the carnage are telling the American people that we do not have the right to know how or where those trillions will end up.

Because of public outrage over AIG, which has received $170 billion in bailout funds, this week AIG released a partial list of the companies receiving TARP money, a list that includes Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Citigroup, Bank of America, and Wachovia.

While the payments are apparently legitimate, the attempted cover-up was infuriating.

Remember the phrase from the Nixon years and Watergate: Follow the money. It still applies.

Prior to the release of the partial list of names, the secretary of the Treasury and the chairman of the Federal Reserve, who knew where the money was going, told us that it is “proprietary information” and not publicly available. Only the proprietor — the owner –—should have that information.

When banks lend money to you, the consumer, they can and do put restrictions on what you can do with it. What is worse, in this case, is that as a result of our pushing money into the coffers of institutions like AIG, we, the American public, have become the real owners of those companies, and we have a right to know.

We were promised transparency by the Obama administration.

The New York Times this week reported on another outrage relating to AIG.

That company which has now, according to the Times on March 15, “received more than $170 billion in taxpayer bailout money from the Treasury and Federal Reserve, plans to pay about $165 million in bonuses by Sunday to 400 executives in the same business unit that brought the company to the brink of collapse last year.”

Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner “told the firm they were unacceptable and demanded they be renegotiated, a senior administration official said. But the bonuses will go forward because lawyers said the firm was contractually obligated to pay them.” Adding to the insult to the public is the revelation that “The payments to AIG’s troubled financial products division are in addition to $121 million in previously scheduled bonuses for the company’s senior executives and 6,400 employees across the sprawling corporation.”

These are the very reasons AIG should have been forced into bankruptcy before the bailout.

No bankruptcy court would have permitted the bonuses to be paid or those granted bailout payments protected with anonymity.

Remember who now owns AIG. According to the Times “AIG, nearly 80 percent of which is now owned by the government . . .” and the new chairman, Edward M. Liddy, is “government-appointed.” In effect, a government owned and operated private sector company is giving out government tax dollars like there is no tomorrow, while trying to bar transparency.

The March 15 Times editorial on the subject points out, “The bailouts of American International Group are also rescues of its trading partners — banks and other financial firms — that would have lost out if the insurer had been allowed to fail. But even after four bailouts between last September and this March, no one knows with certainty who those partners are, or how much of the bailout money, now totaling $160 billion, has gone to make them whole.”

As a result of that editorial, we now have been given a partial list by AIG.

The Watchmen — Geithner and Bernanke — have sought to prevent transparency. President Obama trumpets transparency, even promising that the wonders of the Internet will be available for taxpayers to follow all government transactions involving the expenditure of taxpayer money.

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

My Plan To Reduce the National Debt

Thursday, 10 Jan 2013 12:15 PM

Following is a letter that I sent to the New York Congressional Delegation proposing a project to reduce the national de . . .

My Letter to Prime Minister Cameron

Wednesday, 02 Jan 2013 11:25 AM

My commentary this week is the letter that I sent to Prime Minister David Cameron of Great Britain. I had hoped that by  . . .

NYT's Friedman Is Hostile to Israel

Friday, 28 Dec 2012 15:48 PM

In his December 26 New York Times editorial, Tom Friedman wrote in support of former U.S. Senator Chuck Hagel and the po . . .

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved