NY Police Handled Occupiers with Restraint and Professionalism

Thursday, 22 Dec 2011 02:08 PM

By Edward Koch

Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
I was surprised to learn of the letter sent by Congressman Jerry Nadler — who is my Congressman, by the way — to Attorney General Eric H. Holder requesting the attorney general to investigate, as the New York Times stated, “whether the police in New York and other cities had deprived protesters of rights protected by the Constitution or by law, and to determine what can be done to prevent future similar actions.”

His letter was a reference to the Occupy Wall Street protest, which used Zuccotti Park as its base.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg quite understandably criticized the Congressman for requesting such an investigation. Had I been Mayor, I would have similarly protested.

Indeed, when I was Mayor, other members of Congress at the time, at the request of some civil rights activists, demanded the House Judiciary Committee investigate charges of police brutality alleging biased racial actions by the NYPD.

The current ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, John Conyers, D-MI, then a senior member of the committee responding to the demand of the advocates, first and prior to hearings denounced the city and the NYPD, then held hearings, and then announced that the charges against the NYPD were not sustained. But the damage was done and, of course, the holding of the hearing itself gave credibility to the false charges.

So here too the Congressman’s letter gives credibility to the false charges of advocates for Occupy Wall Street. The protesters occupied Zuccotti Park for two months before the City of New York, acting pursuant to court order, removed the tents and sleeping bags that had been erected against city directives.

Occupy Wall Street is represented by well qualified lawyers to argue the merits of their case in court. They did so and lost. They have a right of appeal. It is reputed that they have a bank account available to them with more than $500,000 in it as a result of donations.

Their rights, in my opinion, have not been violated. Just the opposite. The protestors have violated the rights of others doing business or living in the area of Zuccotti Park.

Congressman Nadler and Speaker of the Assembly Shelly Silver jointly complained by letter to the mayor, stating “Some of the protesters have created serious and quality of life concerns for residents.” So Nadler, as often happens with public officials trying to please constituents, ended up on both sides of the issue.

The forum to determine rights and wrongs in this case are the New York courts. Does Nadler believe they are incapable of doing so and that the U.S. attorney general needs to enter the matter? That is a real smack in the face to New York City.

Occupy Wall Street protesters on December 17th tried to illegally occupy a parcel of land owned by Trinity Church, which had declined to make it available as an encampment for Occupy Wall Street protesters.

Protesters were arrested by the NYPD for their attempted illegal occupation. Did Congressman Nadler condemn Trinity Church, the NYPD or the Occupy Wall Street protesters? Or, is he leaving that issue to the New York courts?

I will now venture an opinion.

Congressman Nadler represents the Upper West Side, a bastion of liberalism and radicalism. Citizens flood him with letters and visits demanding he side with Occupy Wall Street.

He decides that since he’s criticized Occupy Wall Street by letter to the mayor at the request of business people and residents of the area near Zuccotti Park, why not now ingratiate himself with Occupy Wall Street by demanding an investigation of the NYPD and its tactics?

As they say, “It can’t hurt.” But it does hurt. In this case, it attacks the integrity and professionalism of the police, which most New Yorkers would say in this case is unfair. By and large, and with few exceptions, the police handled themselves with restraint and professionalism.

I hope the attorney general will conclude that the New York courts can — and should — handle the matter.

Nadler’s political correctness, seeking to please the advocates, is seen for what it is — the craven response of a politician worried about a possible primary from the left.

© 2012 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
More . . .
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Around the Web
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Follow Newsmax
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Why I Support President Obama

Monday, 21 May 2012 14:47 PM

The campaign for president — to be decided in November — is going to be determined, most people believe, by the state of . . .

Child Abuse Must Be Reported by Hasidim

Monday, 14 May 2012 16:35 PM

The crime of sexually abusing a child, including adolescents and teens, is so heinous that the public is immediately sho . . .

Israel's Existence Is Threatened By Iran

Friday, 11 May 2012 12:28 PM

The issue of how to deal with the threat of Iran manufacturing a nuclear bomb is a matter affecting Israel’s very existe . . .

Latest News Stories
 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved