So, Why Did Obama Agree to a Tax Deal?

Wednesday, 08 Dec 2010 11:06 AM

By John LeBoutillier

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
My first thought when the news broke on Monday night about the deal to extend the Bush era tax cuts: The Republicans secretly placed a new script on President Obama’s teleprompter: “I now love tax breaks for millionaires!”

Barack Obama finally became an engaged president. He made a deal designed to get the economy moving by 2012 so that he can get re-elected.

The fact that the left hates this deal shows that Obama is trying to seize the center, again, and win the 2012 election.

Obama’s first two years of massive federal spending, corporate takeovers, TARP and the stimulus bill, failed miserably to generate private sector economic growth. And time is running out for him to wait for the economy to start growing.

As a friend of mine put it, 9 percent unemployment is the over/under for Obama’s re-election chances. Above 9 percent and he is toast (unless the GOP nominates Palin) and under 9 percent and he has a fighting chance to be re-elected on the argument that, “I have gotten our economy back on track.”

Now Obama has channeled Ronald Reagan with his payroll tax cut and agreement to keep the Bush-era tax cuts in effect and even to cut the estate tax rates. No wonder the left is going nuts!

Their great hope — Barack Obama — is more Reagan and Bush than they can stomach!

The only loser in this arrangement is the long-term financial viability of our nation as another almost $1 trillion will be added onto the already staggering $14 trillion debt we are carrying.

But the President and the GOP leadership decided it was more important to juice the economy now in advance of the 2012 election (after all, everyone in the House is up for re-election in 2012, too) and worry about the debt later.

If it works, Obama can get himself re-elected in 2012. If it does not work, the consequences for both parties will be catastrophic.

The anger that catapulted the tea party movement to political prominence this year will compound itself into a “throw 'em all out” fury in 2012.

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Retype Email:
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

My Quick Debate Analysis

Wednesday, 03 Oct 2012 23:14 PM

These are my quick and spontaneous thoughts on tonight’s first presidential debate: . . .

The Ryan Pick: The Hand of God?

Monday, 13 Aug 2012 10:26 AM

Mitt Romney’s selection of Paul Ryan to be his running mate will not help Romney win the election. . . .

Is Romney Blowing Winnable Election?

Wednesday, 01 Aug 2012 13:22 PM

With 97 days to go, the 2012 presidential election remains Romney’s to lose. The deteriorating economy is President Obam . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved