Login or Register
Welcome , Settings |  Logout

Obama Has 2012 Head Start With bin Laden News

Tuesday, 03 May 2011 07:47 AM

By John LeBoutillier

Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |

In the wake of the killing of Osama bin Laden, self-elected political experts are rushing to proclaim, “President Obama is now guaranteed to win again in 2012!”

Not so fast.

In 1945, less than six months after he led Great Britain out of the darkest days in her history to defeat Nazi Germany, Prime Minister Winston Churchill was himself defeated at the polls.

More recently, in 1991, President George H.W. Bush defeated Saddam Hussein’s forces in Kuwait and drove them back into Iraq. By May of 1991 President Bush had a record-high 91 percent approval rating. Yet 18 months later, he received a mere 37 percent of the vote and lost to Bill Clinton (and Ross Perot).

So anyone who thinks this wonderful, long-awaited killing of Osama bin Laden guarantees President Obama’s re-election 18 months from now is just plain mistaken.

However, here is a simple, two-point plan that would almost guarantee Obama’s re-election.

First, use this long-awaited killing of Osama bin Laden as the point of demarcation for the United States to end its occupation of Afghanistan. The president could announce, in effect, “We have succeeded in our first mission — to capture or kill Osama bin Laden — and we will leave behind a skeleton force to guarantee our second mission; Afghanistan will not become the launching pad for more attacks on the United States.”

The president could then order a drawdown of 90,000 troops and leave 5,000-10,000 either in Afghanistan or in the theater to monitor future terrorist activities in Afghanistan.

Then, Obama’s could deal with the Republicans and tea party representatives to cut the national dbt and deficits by changing Pentagon, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid spending in a fundamental way.

If he did this, the financial markets would rejoice and foreign investors would flock to the United States. We would have finally addressed the long-term budget problems.

Declaring victory in Afghanistan and withdrawing most of our forces and seriously implementing a debt reduction program would leave the GOP almost nowhere to run in 2012. The key voting bloc — independents — would go for Obama in a big, big way.

Only one caveat: If the economy goes back in the tank, then Obama would still have trouble in 2012. Barring that, he’d be heavily favored.

Let’s hope he doesn’t read this column.

© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
More . . .
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax community.
Register to share your comments with the community. Already a member? Login
Note: Comments from readers do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of Newsmax Media. While we attempt to review comments, if you see an inappropriate comment you can block it by rolling over the comment, clicking the down arrow and selecting "Flag As Inappropriate."
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Top Stories
Around the Web
You May Also Like

My Quick Debate Analysis

Wednesday, 03 Oct 2012 23:14 PM

These are my quick and spontaneous thoughts on tonight’s first presidential debate: . . .

Tale of the Tape Favors Neither Candidate

Thursday, 13 Sep 2012 12:32 PM

Back in the days when boxing was a front-line, major sport in our country the excitement before a huge championship figh . . .

The Ryan Pick: The Hand of God?

Monday, 13 Aug 2012 10:26 AM

Mitt Romney’s selection of Paul Ryan to be his running mate will not help Romney win the election.  . . .

 
 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved